Potential impacts of blockchain based equity crowdfunding on the economic feasibility of offshore wind energy investments

被引:8
|
作者
Stekli, Joseph [1 ]
Cali, Umit [2 ]
机构
[1] Elect Power Res Inst, 1300 WWT Harris Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28262 USA
[2] NTNU, Dept Elect Power Engn, Elektro E-F,E427,OS Bragstads Plass 2e, Gloshaugen, Norway
关键词
TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1063/5.0021029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper explores the potential to reduce the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of offshore wind technology through the use of digitalized financial innovations made possible by Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). Specifically, this paper proposed a novel application of DLT to crowdsource project finance for clean energy projects. An introduction to DLT technology and some of its potential applications is provided first. Next, the potential to move from a more centralized, top-down energy system to a more decentralized, two-way transactive energy system enabled by DLT is discussed. Within this new energy system framework, the idea of crowd-sourced equity funding of the capital cost of renewable energy is introduced. The impact of crowdfunded equity on the LCOE is then explored via the creation of a theoretical offshore wind installation off the coast of New Jersey. An existing offshore wind capital cost model is modified for use in the U.S., and an existing wind annual energy production model is utilized to provide inputs into a LCOE model. Finally, the potential impacts that DLT based crowdfunded equity may have on cost of debt, debt tenor, and debt-to-equity ratio are also input into the LCOE model in order to examine the range of potential impacts it may have on offshore wind LCOE.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DLT-based equity crowdfunding on the techno-economic feasibility of solar energy investments
    Halden, Ugur
    Cali, Umit
    Dynge, Marthe Fogstad
    Stekli, Joseph
    Bai, Linquan
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2021, 227 : 137 - 150
  • [2] Blockchain-Enabled Equity Crowdfunding for Energy Storage Investments
    Cali, Umit
    Halden, Ugur
    Dynge, Marthe Fogstad
    Bukvic-Schaefer, Aleksandra-Sasa
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (SEST), 2021,
  • [3] Potential Impacts and Economic Value of US Offshore Wind
    Daniel, John
    Liu, Shu
    Pan, Jiuping
    [J]. 2015 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2015,
  • [4] The regional economic impacts of offshore wind energy developments in Scotland
    Connolly, Kevin
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 160 : 148 - 159
  • [5] Identification and analysis of impact factors on the economic feasibility of wind energy investments
    de Oliveira Azevedo, Romulo
    Rotela Junior, Paulo
    Chicco, Gianfranco
    Aquila, Giancarlo
    Souza Rocha, Luiz Celio
    Santana Peruchi, Rogerio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (03) : 3671 - 3697
  • [6] Kickstarting blockchain: designing blockchain-based tokens for equity crowdfunding
    Guggenberger T.
    Schellinger B.
    von Wachter V.
    Urbach N.
    [J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2024, 24 (01) : 239 - 273
  • [7] Economic feasibility of floating offshore wind farms
    Castro-Santos, Laura
    Filgueira-Vizoso, Almudena
    Carral-Couce, Luis
    Fraguela Formoso, Jose Angel
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 868 - 882
  • [8] ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON THE COMMERCIAL SEA SCALLOP FISHERY
    Borsetti, Sarah
    Scheld, Andrew S.
    Rudders, David
    Munroe, Daphne M.
    Powell, Eric N.
    Hofmann, Eileen E.
    Klinck, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2023, 42 : 54 - 54
  • [9] Assessment of the Offshore Wind Energy Potential in the Romanian Exclusive Economic Zone
    Onea, Florin
    Rusu, Eugen
    Rusu, Liliana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [10] Feasibility analysis for floating offshore wind energy
    Carmela Maienza
    Alberto Maria Avossa
    Vincenzo Picozzi
    Francesco Ricciardelli
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 796 - 812