Influence of pelvic lymph node dissection and node-positive disease on biochemical recurrence, secondary treatment, and survival after radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Washington, Samuel L., III [1 ]
Cowan, Janet E. [1 ]
Herlemann, Annika [1 ,2 ]
Zuniga, Kyle B. [3 ]
Masic, Selma [4 ]
Nguyen, Hao G. [1 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[4] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Div Urol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
PROSTATE | 2021年 / 81卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; node positive; radical prostatectomy; lymph node dissection; RISK; OUTCOMES; LYMPHADENECTOMY; STRAIGHTFORWARD; PATTERNS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear given the low prevalence of known nodal disease (pN1) and concerns about its therapeutic utility. Objective To characterize the impact of PLND and secondary treatment on oncologic outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Cohort study of men who underwent primary RP with PLND for prostate cancer (PCa) at our institution since 2003. Men stratified by nodal status. Outcome Measures and Statistical Analysis Outcomes include biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), overall survival, and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). Multivariable Cox regression models used for each outcome. Results and Limitations Of 1,543 men who underwent primary RP, 174 (11%) had pN1 disease. Median follow-up was 34 months (interquartile range, 15-62). Seven-year outcomes were similar whether less than or >= 14 LNs dissected. Among node-positive patients, 29% had undetectable (UDT) prostate-specific antigen (PSA), 11% had UDT PSA + adjuvant therapy, and 60% had detectable PSA, and 7-year bRFS differed (75% for UDT PSA, 90% for UDT + adjuvant therapy, 38% for detectable PSA,p < .01). Survival outcomes did not differ. In multivariable analysis, detectable PSA (vs. UDT, HR 5.2, 95% CI 2.0-13.3) associated with worse bRFS. After salvage treatment, 7-year outcomes did not differ between groups. Study limited by retrospective review.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 108
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of node-positive disease after radical prostatectomy on biochemical recurrence and oncologic outcomes in men with prostate cancer
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Herlemann, Annika
    Zuniga, Kyle Brian
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [2] INFLUENCE OF NODE-POSITIVE DISEASE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AND EARLY ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER
    Washington, Samuel
    Cowan, Janet
    Herlemann, Annika
    Zuniga, Kyle
    Masic, Selma
    Nguyen, Hao
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1027 - E1027
  • [3] Salvage Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection after Radical Prostatectomy for Biochemical and Lymph Node Recurrence
    Peeters, Charlotte
    Ponette, Diederik
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 98 (03) : 367 - 369
  • [4] Management of Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Valerio, Massimo
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Tsaur, Igor
    Mathieu, Romain
    Ceci, Francesco
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Thibault, Constance
    Ost, Piet
    Tilki, Derya
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Moschini, Marco
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Gontero, Paolo
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 565 - 581
  • [5] LYMPH NODE DENSITY IN NODE-POSITIVE PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Vagnoni, Valerio
    Borghesi, Marco
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Dababneh, Hussam
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Pultrone, Cristian V.
    Saraceni, Giacomo
    Mengoni, Francesco
    Passaretti, Giovanni
    Diazzi, Davide
    Martorana, Giuseppe
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (05) : 2681 - 2681
  • [6] Characterization of Lymph Node Tumor Burden in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Patients after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
    Gottlieb, Josh
    Chang, Shu-Ching
    Choe, Jane
    Grunkemeier, Gary L.
    Hanes, Douglas A.
    Krasne, David
    Hoon, Dave S. B.
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [7] The Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Gakis, Georgios
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Joniau, Steven
    Karazanashvili, Guram
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Mattei, Agostino
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Wirth, Manfred
    Stief, Christian G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [8] Survival Benefit of Radical Prostatectomy in Lymph Node-Positive Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Engel, Jutta
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Baur, Helmut
    Beer, Volker
    Chaussy, Christian
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    Oberneder, Ralph
    Rothenberger, Karl H.
    Stief, Christian G.
    Hoelzel, Dieter
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (05) : 754 - 761
  • [9] More Extensive Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Improves Survival in Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer
    Abdollah, Firas
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Salonia, Andrea
    Nini, Alessandro
    Moschini, Marco
    Sun, Maxine
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Shariat, Sharhokh F.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [10] Natural History of Clinical Recurrence Patterns of Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
    Moschini, Marco
    Sharma, Vidit
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Quevedo, J. Fernando
    Davis, Brian J.
    Kwona, Eugene
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 135 - 142