Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records 2011-2016

被引:2
|
作者
Boland, Michael V. [1 ,2 ]
Hwang, Thomas S. [3 ]
Lim, Michele C. [4 ]
Peterson, Jessica L. [5 ]
Lum, Flora [5 ]
Lee, Aaron Y. [6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, 600 North Wolfe St,Wilmer 131, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Hlth Sci Informat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Casey Eye Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Amer Acad Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Ophthalmol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MEANINGFUL USE; PERCEPTIONS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.030
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate ophthalmologists' rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties. Design: Administrative database study. Participants: Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Methods: Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor. Results: In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists. (C) 2019 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:928 / 934
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The 2011 Medicare Electronic Health Records Incentive Program
    Kan, Jeffrey T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2011, 7 (04) : 271 - 272
  • [2] TRENDS IN TREATMENT PATTERNS AND SEQUENCING IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA DIAGNOSED 2011-2016 IN THE UNITED STATES USING AN ENHANCED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS DATABASE
    Ung, B.
    Abouzaid, S.
    Ni, Q.
    Parikh, K.
    Agarwal, A.
    [J]. HAEMATOLOGICA, 2017, 102 : 526 - 526
  • [3] Frailty and Determinants of Health Among Older Adults in the United States 2011-2016
    Kurnat-Thoma, Emma L.
    Murray, Meghan T.
    Juneau, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2022, 34 (02) : 233 - 244
  • [4] Trends in Internet Use Among Older Adults in the United States, 2011-2016
    Yoon, Hyunwoo
    Jang, Yuri
    Kim, Seoyoun
    Speasmaker, Alycia
    Nam, Ilsung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2021, 40 (05) : 466 - 470
  • [6] Evidence for Household Transmission of Rotavirus in the United States, 2011-2016
    Wikswo, Mary E.
    Parashar, Umesh D.
    Lopman, Benjamin
    Selvarangan, Rangaraj
    Harrison, Christopher J.
    Azimi, Parvin H.
    Boom, Julie A.
    Sahni, Leila C.
    Englund, Janet A.
    Klein, Eileen J.
    Staat, Mary Allen
    McNeal, Monica M.
    Halasa, Natasha
    Chappell, James
    Weinberg, Geoffrey A.
    Szilagyi, Peter G.
    Esona, Mathew D.
    Bowen, Michael D.
    Payne, Daniel C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2020, 9 (02) : 181 - 187
  • [7] Trends in the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in the United States, 2011-2016
    Hirode, Grishma
    Wong, Robert J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (24): : 2526 - 2528
  • [8] Prevalence of Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2011-2016
    Cheng, Yiling J.
    Kanaya, Alka M.
    Araneta, Maria Rosario G.
    Saydah, Sharon H.
    Kahn, Henry S.
    Gregg, Edward W.
    Fujimoto, Wilfred Y.
    Imperatore, Giuseppina
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (24): : 2389 - 2398
  • [9] Adoption of Electronic Health Records and Perceptions of Financial and Clinical Outcomes Among Ophthalmologists in the United States
    Lim, Michele C.
    Boland, Michael V.
    McCannel, Colin A.
    Saini, Arvind
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Epley, David
    Lum, Flora
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 136 (02) : 164 - 170
  • [10] Prevalence and distribution of high-risk prescription opioid use in the United States, 2011-2016
    McCormick, Carter D.
    Dadiomov, David
    Trotzky-Sirr, Rebecca
    Qato, Dima M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (11) : 1532 - 1540