Turtle bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery off southern Africa

被引:18
|
作者
Petersen, S. L. [1 ,2 ]
Honig, M. B. [1 ]
Ryan, P. G. [2 ]
Nel, R. [3 ]
Underhill, L. G. [4 ]
机构
[1] WWF S Africa, WWF Responsible Fisheries Programme, ZA-8002 Waterfront, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Percy Fitzpatrick Inst African Ornithol, DST NRF Ctr Excellence, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[3] Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Univ, Dept Zool, ZA-6031 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[4] Univ Cape Town, Dept Zool, Anim Demog Unit, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
bycatch; conservation; pelagic longline; South Africa; turtles; SEA-TURTLES; LOGGERHEAD TURTLES; DERMOCHELYS-CORIACEA; LEATHERBACK TURTLES; INCIDENTAL CAPTURE; CARETTA-CARETTA; CHELONIA-MYDAS; BY-CATCH; MORTALITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.2989/AJMS.2009.31.1.8.779
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Capture by pelagic longline fisheries has been identified as a key threat to turtle populations. This study is the first assessment of turtle bycatch in the South African pelagic longline fishery for tunas Thunnus spp. and swordfish Xiphias gladius. A total of 181 turtles was caught on observed sets between 1998 and 2005, at a rate of 0.04 per 1 000 hooks (0-15.5 per 1 000 hooks, SD = 1.28). Loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta comprised 60.0% of the total turtle capture and were caught at rate of 0.02 per 1 000 hooks. The second most commonly caught species was the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea (33.8%), which were caught at rate of 0.01 per 1 000 hooks. Five hawksbill turtles Eretmochelys imbricata were caught at a rate of 0.001 per 1 000 hooks and three green turtles Chelonia mydas at a rate of 0.001 per 1 000 hooks. Catches were clustered, with 70% of turtles caught on 1% of sets. Apart from one set on the Agulhas Bank, on the southern coast of South Africa, all sets that caught three or more turtles were on the Walvis Ridge and on the shelf edge north of the Orange River (25 degrees-31 degrees S and 0 degrees-15 degrees E). Most of the variance in turtle bycatch was accounted for by 'vessel'. Five vessels (of a total of 50) caught 65% of turtles, at a rate of 0.4 per 1 000 hooks. The target species (swordfish or tunas) was the second most important explanatory variable; 89.5% of turtles were caught by swordfish-directed vessels at a rate of 0.15 per 1 000 hooks. Season was the third most important explanatory variable, with more turtles caught between January and June (0.13 per 1 000 per hooks) than in the remainder of the year (0.03 per 1 000 hooks), although leatherback turtles tended to be caught throughout the year. Extrapolations based on stratification by 5 degrees grid cell, by season and by target species estimated that a total of 190 turtles was caught per year (approximately 100 loggerheads and 50 leatherbacks). Using three different techniques, the extrapolations varied between 190 and 560 turtles per year. However, if the proposed increase in fishing effort to 50 rights-holders is effected, turtle bycatch is likely to increase to about 770 turtles per year. Leatherback turtles caught by the South African pelagic longline fisheries are likely to be from the local nesting population. That population has been protected at its nesting beaches but has not recovered as expected. The overlap of turtle tracks and fishing effort suggests that the longline fishery could be partially responsible for the slow recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 96
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seabird bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery off southern Africa
    Petersen, S. L.
    Honig, M. B.
    Ryan, P. G.
    Underhill, L. G.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (02) : 191 - 204
  • [2] Seabird bycatch in the demersal longline fishery off southern Africa
    Petersen, S. L.
    Honig, M. B.
    Ryan, P. G.
    Underhill, L. G.
    Goren, M.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (02) : 205 - 214
  • [3] Pelagic shark bycatch in the tuna- and swordfish-directed longline fishery off southern Africa
    Petersen, S. L.
    Honig, M. B.
    Ryan, P. G.
    Underhill, L. G.
    Compagno, L. J. V.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (02) : 215 - 225
  • [4] Patterns and trends in seabird bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery off South Africa
    Rollinson, D. P.
    Wanless, R. M.
    Ryan, P. G.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 39 (01) : 9 - 25
  • [5] Sea turtle bycatch in the Chilean pelagic longline fishery in the southeastern Pacific: Opportunities for conservation
    Donoso, Miguel
    Dutton, Peter H.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (11) : 2672 - 2684
  • [6] Effect of bait species and color on sea turtle bycatch and fish catch in a pelagic longline fishery
    Yokota, Kosuke
    Kiyota, Masashi
    Okamura, Hiroshi
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2009, 97 (1-2) : 53 - 58
  • [7] Pelagic shark bycatch in the New Zealand tuna longline fishery
    Francis, MP
    Griggs, LH
    Baird, SJ
    [J]. MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (02) : 165 - 178
  • [8] Measuring the economic abatement cost of sea turtle bycatch in the Northwest Atlantic commercial pelagic longline fishery
    Solis, Daniel
    Bisack, Kathryn
    Walden, John
    Richards, Paul
    Agar, Juan
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2021, 133
  • [9] Shark bycatch and depredation in the US Atlantic pelagic longline fishery
    Mandelman, John W.
    Cooper, Peter W.
    Werner, Timothy B.
    Lagueux, Kerry M.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2008, 18 (04) : 427 - 442
  • [10] Tori lines mitigate seabird bycatch in a pelagic longline fishery
    Eric Gilman
    Milani Chaloupka
    Asuka Ishizaki
    Mathew Carnes
    Hollyann Naholowaa
    Colby Brady
    Sarah Ellgen
    Eric Kingma
    [J]. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2021, 31 : 653 - 666