Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopicversusrobotic surgical learning curves

被引:20
|
作者
Gall, T. M. H. [1 ]
Alrawashdeh, W. [2 ]
Soomro, N. [3 ]
White, S. [2 ]
Jiao, L. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll, Royal Marsden Hosp, Acad Surg Unit, London SW3677, England
[2] Freeman Rd Hosp, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Urol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2020年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
CANCER; COLECTOMY; SURGERY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/bjs5.50353
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Minimally invasive surgery is the standard technique for many operations. Laparoscopic training has a long learning curve. Robotic solutions may shorten the training pathway. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic with robotic training in surgical trainees and medical students. Methods Surgical trainees (ST group) were randomized to receive 6 h of robotic or laparoscopic simulation training. They then performed three surgical tasks in cadaveric specimens. Medical students (MS group) had 2 h of robotic or laparoscopic simulation training followed by one surgical task. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) score (maximum 30), number of suture errors, and time to complete each procedure were recorded. Results The median GRS score for the ST group was better for each procedure after robotic training compared with laparoscopic training (total GRS score: 27 center dot 00 (i.q.r. 22 center dot 25-28 center dot 33)versus18 center dot 00 (16 center dot 50-19 center dot 04) respectively,P < 0 center dot 001; 10 participants in each arm). The ST group made fewer errors in robotic than in laparoscopic tasks, for both continuous (7 center dot 00 (4 center dot 75-9 center dot 63)versus22 center dot 25 (20 center dot 75-25 center dot 25);P < 0 center dot 001) and interrupted (8 center dot 25 (6 center dot 38-10 center dot 13)versus29 center dot 50 (23 center dot 75-31 center dot 50);P < 0 center dot 001) sutures. For the MS group, the robotic group completed 8 center dot 67 interrupted sutures with 15 center dot 50 errors in 40 min, compared with only 3 center dot 50 sutures with 40 center dot 00 errors in the laparoscopic group (P < 0 center dot 001) (10 participants in each arm). Fatigue and physical comfort levels were better after robotic compared with laparoscopic operating for both groups (P < 0 center dot 001). Conclusion The acquisition of surgical skills in surgical trainees and the surgically naive takes less time with a robotic compared with a laparoscopic platform.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1108
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on: Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves
    Minty, I.
    Nowinka, Z.
    [J]. BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (04):
  • [2] Author response to: Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves
    Jiao, Long
    Gall, Tamara M. H.
    [J]. BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (06):
  • [3] Effects of Gender Bias and Stereotypes in Surgical Training A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Myers, Sara P.
    Dasari, Mohini
    Brown, Joshua B.
    Lumpkin, Stephanie T.
    Neal, Matthew D.
    Abebe, Kaleab Z.
    Chaumont, Nicole
    Downs-Canner, Stephanie M.
    Flanagan, Meghan R.
    Lee, Kenneth K.
    Rosengart, Matthew R.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (07) : 552 - 560
  • [4] SURGICAL TRAINING AND CLINICAL TRIALS Surgical training and clinical trial involvement-the trainees' view
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Marriott, Paul
    Nepogodiev, Dmitri
    Kolias, Angelos G.
    Jamjoom, Aimun
    Gardiner, Matthew D.
    McDermott, Frank D.
    Skerritt, Clare
    Harries, Rhiannon L.
    Cornish, Julie
    Stimpson, Amy L.
    Glasbey, James C.
    Bosanquet, Dave C.
    Chapman, Stephen
    Shaikh, Shafaque
    Taylor, Greg
    Lee, Matthew
    Wild, Jonathan
    Mawdsley, Matt
    Manning, Will
    Jaunoo, Shameen
    Adams, Hannah L.
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Smith, Jennifer A.
    Burdett, Clare
    Gokani, Vimal J.
    Stather, Philip W.
    Haddow, James B.
    Symons, Nicholas R. A.
    Ventham, Nicholas
    Nicholson, Gary
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [5] Enhancing cosmetic suturing skill acquisition in surgical residents through spaced learning training: a randomized controlled trial
    Yan, Xinjian
    Abudouresuli, Adilijiang
    Yuemaier, Abudukeremu
    Ge, Yan
    Shang, Shiyao
    Yang, Jue
    Zhang, Liulu
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2024, 56 (01)
  • [6] "RESET ROBOTICS" REMODELLING SURGICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN ROBOTICS
    Costello, Daniel
    Ghazi, Ahmed
    Costello, Tony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E189 - E189
  • [7] Clinical equipoise and the surgical randomized controlled trial
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Barker, Fred G., II
    Carter, Bob S.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 62 (06) : N9 - N10
  • [8] Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills
    Sarle, R
    Tewari, A
    Shrivastava, A
    Peabody, J
    Menon, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [9] Mental training in surgical education: A randomized controlled trial
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Warren, Oliver
    Darzi, Ara
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (06) : 1002 - 1002
  • [10] Mental training in surgical education -: A randomized controlled trial
    Immenroth, Marc
    Buerger, Thomas
    Brenner, Juergen
    Nagelschmidt, Manfred
    Eberspaecher, Hans
    Troidl, Hans
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (03) : 385 - 391