Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor™ training -: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study

被引:1
|
作者
Andreatta, Pamela B.
Woodrum, Derek T.
Birkmeyer, John D.
Yellamanchilli, Rajani K.
Doherty, Gerard M.
Gauger, Paul G.
Minter, Rebecca M.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Med Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine if prior training on the LapMentor(TM) laparoscopic simulator leads to improved performance of basic laparoscopic skills in the animate operating room environment. Summary Background Data: Numerous influences have led to the development of computer-aided laparoscopic simulators: a need for greater efficiency in training, the unique and complex nature of laparoscopic surgery, and the increasing demand that surgeons demonstrate competence before proceeding to the operating room. The LapMentor(TM) simulator is expensive, however, and its use must be validated and justified prior to implementation into surgical training programs. Methods: Nineteen surgical interns were randomized to training on the LapMentor(TM) laparoscopic simulator (n = 10) or to a control group (no simulator training, n = 9). Subjects randomized to the LapMentor(TM) trained to expert criterion levels 2 consecutive times on 6 designated basic skills modules. All subjects then completed a series of laparoscopic exercises in a live porcine model, and performance was assessed independently by 2 blinded reviewers. Time, accuracy rates, and global assessments of performance were recorded with an interrater reliability between reviewers of 0.99. Results: LapMentor(TM) trained interns completed the 30 degrees camera navigation exercise in significantly less time than control interns (166 +/- 52 vs. 220 39 seconds, P < 0.05); they also achieved higher accuracy rates in identifying the required objects with the laparoscope (96% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 15%, P < 0.05). Similarly, on the two-handed object transfer exercise, task completion time for LapMentor(TM) trained versus control interns was 130 +/- 23 versus 184 +/- 43 seconds (P < 0.01) with an accuracy rate of 98% +/- 5% versus 80% +/- 13% (P < 0.001). Additionally, LapMentor(TM) trained interns outperformed control subjects with regard to camera navigation skills, efficiency of motion, optimal instrument handling, perceptual ability, and performance of safe electrocautery. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that prior training on the LapMentor(TM) laparoscopic simulator leads to improved resident performance of basic skills in the animate operating room environment. This work marks the first prospective, randomized evaluation of the LapMentor(TM) simulator, and provides evidence that LapMentor TM training may lead to improved operating room performance.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 863
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Training of Basic Laparoscopic Skills on LapMentor
    Kalinov, Turgay
    Zlatarov, Alexandar
    Daskalov, Sivo
    Bliznakova, Kristina
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING (EHB 2021), 9TH EDITION, 2021,
  • [2] Virtual reality training improves operating room performance - Results of a randomized, double-blinded study
    Seymour, NE
    Gallagher, AG
    Roman, SA
    O'Brien, MK
    Bansal, VK
    Andersen, DK
    Satava, RM
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (04) : 458 - 464
  • [3] Virtual reality training improves junior residents' operating room performance: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of the complete laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    McClusky, DA
    Gallagher, AG
    Ritter, EM
    Lederman, AB
    Van Sickle, KR
    Baghai, M
    Smith, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (03) : S73 - S73
  • [4] The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial
    Ralph E. Butler
    Rachel Burke
    James J. Schneider
    Harpreet Brar
    Paul A. Lucha
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 : 387 - 390
  • [5] The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial
    Butler, Ralph E.
    Burke, Rachel
    Schneider, James J.
    Brar, Harpreet
    Lucha, Paul A., Jr.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (03): : 387 - 390
  • [6] Randomized double-blinded trial investigating the impact of a curriculum focused on error recognition on laparoscopic suturing training
    Bingener, Juliane
    Boyd, Tanner
    Van Sickle, Kent
    Jung, Inkyung
    Saha, Arup
    Winston, John
    Lopez, Peter
    Ojeda, Herminio
    Schwesinger, Wayne
    Anastakis, Dimitri
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (02): : 179 - 182
  • [7] Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy - What is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial
    Ignacio, RC
    Burke, R
    Spencer, D
    Bissell, C
    Dorsainvil, C
    Lucha, PA
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (02): : 334 - 337
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: What is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial
    R. C. Ignacio
    R. Burke
    D. Spencer
    C. Bissell
    C. Dorsainvil
    P. A. Lucha
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18 : 334 - 337
  • [9] Corticosteroids or Not for Postoperative Nausea: A Double-Blinded Randomized Study
    Nordin, L.
    Nordlund, A.
    Lindqvist, A.
    Gislason, H.
    Hedenbro, J. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (08) : 1517 - 1522
  • [10] Corticosteroids or Not for Postoperative Nausea: A Double-Blinded Randomized Study
    L. Nordin
    A. Nordlund
    A. Lindqvist
    H. Gislason
    J. L. Hedenbro
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 : 1517 - 1522