Calibrating cross-site variability for reliability-based design of pile foundations

被引:34
|
作者
Zhang, J. [1 ,2 ]
Li, J. P. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, L. M. [3 ]
Huang, H. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Piles; Uncertainty; Load test; Bayesian method; Reliability-based design; RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN; LOAD; METAANALYSIS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.07.013
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The cross-site variability (i.e., variability from site to site) makes the statistics of the bias factor of a design model vary from site to site. How to characterize the cross-site variability of the model bias factor is important for design of pile foundations based on site-specific load test data. In this study, a probabilistic model that allows for explicit modeling of the cross-site variability is suggested. An equation is derived based on Bayes' theorem to calibrate the suggested model with load test data from different sites, which is applicable even when the number of load tests at each site is small. A procedure based on hybrid Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation is employed to solve the Bayesian equation. How to update the statistics of the model bias factor, when applied to a future site, with site-specific load test data is also described. As an illustration, the probabilistic model is applied to the design of bored piles in Shanghai, China. It is found that, given a certain number of site-specific pile load tests, the effect of updating depends on the mean and the COV of the measured model bias factor. With the assistance of regional experience, a small number of load tests can significantly reduce the uncertainty associated with the design model, and further increase in the number of load tests may not change the site-specific statistics of the bias factor and hence the resistance factor substantially. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 163
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling spatial variability in pile capacity for reliability-based design
    Gambino, SJ
    Gilbert, RB
    ANALYSIS, DESIGN CONSTRUCTION, AND TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS, 1999, (88): : 135 - 149
  • [2] Reliability-based code revision for design of pile foundations: Practice in Shanghai, China
    Li, J. P.
    Zhang, J.
    Liu, S. N.
    Juang, C. H.
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2015, 55 (03) : 637 - 649
  • [3] RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OF SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
    BASMA, AA
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1991, 33 (02) : 215 - 230
  • [4] Reliability-Based Geotechnical Design of Geothermal Foundations
    Wang, Lei
    Smith, Nicholas
    Khoshnevisan, Sara
    Luo, Zhe
    Juang, Hsein
    GEOTECHNICAL FRONTIERS 2017: GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS, MODELING, AND TESTING, 2017, (280): : 124 - 132
  • [5] Reliability-based Design of Pile Diameter in Loess Area
    Xu, Zhijun
    ADVANCES OF TRANSPORTATION: INFRASTRUCTURE AND MATERIALS, VOL 2, 2016, : 790 - 796
  • [6] Reliability-based design for transmission line structure foundations
    Phoon, KK
    Kulhawy, FH
    Grigoriu, MD
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2000, 26 (3-4) : 169 - 185
  • [7] Reliability-Based Economic Design Optimization of Spread Foundations
    Wang, Yu
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (07) : 954 - 959
  • [8] Assessment of variable uncertainties for reliability-based design of foundations
    Foye, K. C.
    Salgado, R.
    Scott, B.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (09) : 1197 - 1207
  • [9] Multivariate approach in reliability-based design of a sheet pile wall
    Prastings, Anders
    Larsson, Stefan
    Mueller, Rasmus
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2016, 7 : 1 - 12
  • [10] Reliability-based pile design in sandy soils by CPT measurements
    Cherubini, C.
    Vessia, G.
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2010, 4 (01) : 2 - 12