Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning

被引:14
|
作者
Bertels, Julie [1 ,2 ]
Destrebecqz, Arnaud [1 ]
Franco, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ULB, ULB Neurosci Inst UNI, CRCN, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Fonds Rech Sci FNRS, Brussels, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
visual statistical learning; implicit learning; explicit knowledge; conscious awareness; subjective measures; UNCONSCIOUS KNOWLEDGE; IMPLICIT; ACQUISITION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01806
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The statistical regularities of a sequence of visual shapes can be learned incidentally. Arciuli et al. (2014) recently argued that intentional instructions only improve learning at slow presentation rates as they favor the use of explicit strategies. The aim of the present study was (1) to test this assumption directly by investigating how instructions (incidental vs. intentional) and presentation rate (fast vs. slow) affect the acquisition of knowledge and (2) to examine how these factors influence the conscious vs. unconscious nature of the knowledge acquired. To this aim, we exposed participants to four triplets of shapes, presented sequentially in a pseudo-random order, and assessed their degree of learning in a subsequent completion task that integrated confidence judgments. Supporting Arciuli et al.'s (2014) claim, participant performance only benefited from intentional instructions at slow presentation rates. Moreover, informing participants beforehand about the existence of statistical regularities increased their explicit knowledge of the sequences, an effect that was not modulated by presentation speed. These results support that, although visual statistical learning can take place incidentally and, to some extent, outside conscious awareness, factors such as presentation rate and prior knowledge can boost learning of these regularities, presumably by favoring the acquisition of explicit knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Timing is everything: Changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning
    Emberson, Lauren L.
    Conway, Christopher M.
    Christiansen, Morten H.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (05): : 1021 - 1040
  • [2] Seeing and hearing in space and time: Effects of modality and presentation rate on implicit statistical learning
    Conway, Christopher M.
    Christiansen, Morten H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 21 (04): : 561 - 580
  • [3] Effects of tDCS on visual statistical learning
    Nydam, Abbey S.
    Sewell, David K.
    Dux, Paul E.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 148
  • [4] EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS, FIXED RATE OF PRESENTATION, AND COMPLEXITY ON FREE LOOKING TIME
    WAIBEL, H
    THOMPSON, RW
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1971, 9 (04): : 377 - &
  • [5] Modality, presentation, domain and training effects in statistical learning
    Lukics, Krisztina Sara
    Lukacs, Agnes
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [6] Modality, presentation, domain and training effects in statistical learning
    Krisztina Sára Lukics
    Ágnes Lukács
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12 (1)
  • [7] PRESENTATION RATE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO GUESS IN FREE RECALL
    KEPPEL, G
    MALLORY, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 79 (2P1): : 269 - &
  • [8] Does animacy affect visual statistical learning? Revisiting the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning
    Cox, Jolene A.
    Wu, Yizhou
    Davies, Anne M. Aimola
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 77 (03): : 492 - 510
  • [9] MEDIATIONAL INSTRUCTIONS, STAGE OF PRACTICE, PRESENTATION RATE, AND RETRIEVAL CUE IN PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING
    ARBUCKLE, TY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 88 (03): : 396 - &
  • [10] PRESENTATION RATE EFFECTS IN PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING
    CALFEE, RC
    ANDERSON, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 88 (02): : 239 - &