Efficacy of Subacromial Ropivacaine Infusion for Rotator Cuff Surgery A Randomized Trial

被引:46
|
作者
Coghlan, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Forbes, Andrew [1 ]
McKenzie, Dean [1 ]
Bell, Simon N. [1 ]
Buchbinder, Rachelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Malvern, Vic 3144, Australia
来源
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN-CONTROL; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER SURGERY; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; INTERSCALENE BLOCK; REPAIR; PUMP; INFILTRATION; RELIABILITY; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.00948
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Local anesthetic administered directly to the operative site by slow infusion has become a popular supplementary pain management strategy following rotator cuff surgery, but it is expensive and there is little conclusive evidence that it provides additional benefits. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of ropivacaine infusion following arthroscopic or mini-incision rotator cuff surgery. Methods: We performed a randomized, participant and outcome assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Participants, stratified by operative procedure (either arthroscopic decompression or rotator cuff repair), were given preemptive 1% ropivacaine (20 mL) and intraoperative intravenous parecoxib (40 mg) and were randomly assigned to 0.75% ropivacaine or placebo by elastomeric pump at 5 mL/hr. Pain at rest was reported on a verbal analogue scale at fifteen, thirty, and sixty minutes and at two, four, eight, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four hours. The use of alternative analgesia, delay in discharge, and adverse events, including development of stiff painful shoulder, infection, and leakage, were also assessed. Results: Eighty-eight participants received arthroscopic decompression (forty-three in the placebo arm and forty-five in the ropivacaine arm) and seventy received rotator cuff repair (thirty-five participants in each treatment arm). Compared with placebo, ropivacaine infusion resulted in a significant but clinically unimportant improvement in average pain in the first twelve hours following both procedures (the average pain score was 1.62 and 2.16 for the ropivacaine and placebo arms, respectively, in the arthroscopic decompression group and 2.12 and 2.82 in the rotator cuff repair group, with a pooled difference between groups of 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 1.01; p=0.003). When adjusted for opioid use, the pooled difference between groups was 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.86; p=0.009). No difference was detected between groups with regard to the maximum pain in the first twelve hours or the average or maximum pain in the second twelve hours, with or without adjustment for opioid use, and no difference was found between groups with regard to the amount of oral analgesia used. No difference was detected between groups with regard to the prevalence of nausea and vomiting, catheter leakage, delayed discharge, or stiff painful shoulder, and no participant in either group had a postoperative infection develop. Conclusions: We found minimal evidence to support the use of ropivacaine infusion for improving outcomes following rotator cuff surgery in the setting of preemptive ropivacaine and intraoperative parecoxib.
引用
收藏
页码:1558 / 1567
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Subacromial versus interscalene continuous infusion of ropivacaine
    Delaunay, L
    Souron, V
    Lafosse, L
    Marret, E
    Toussaint, B
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [2] The comparison of the efficacy of intramuscular tetracosactide and subacromial triamcinolone injection in rotator cuff tendinitis: a randomized trial
    Orandi, Amir Hossein
    Mansour, Amirpasha
    Bagheri, Nima
    Majedi, Hossein
    Meibodi, Seyed Ali Emami
    Pestehei, Seyed Khalil
    Saberian, Peyman
    RHEUMATOLOGY ADVANCES IN PRACTICE, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [3] Subacromial decompression surgery for rotator cuff disease
    Karjalainen, Teemu V.
    Jain, Nitin B.
    Page, Cristina M.
    Lahdeoja, Tuomas A.
    Johnston, Renea V.
    Salamh, Paul
    Kavaja, Lauri
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Vandvik, Per O.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (01):
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of a subacromial continuous ropivacaine infusion for post-operative pain management following arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery: A protocol for a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Jennifer A Coghlan
    Andrew Forbes
    Simon N Bell
    Rachelle Buchbinder
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of a subacromial continuous ropivacaine infusion for post-operative pain management following arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery: A protocol for a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Coghlan, Jennifer A.
    Forbes, Andrew
    Bell, Simon N.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [6] Efficacy of suprascapular nerve block compared with subacromial injection: a randomized controlled trial in patients with rotator cuff tears
    Coory, Joseph A.
    Parr, Adam F.
    Wilkinson, Matthew P.
    Gupta, Ashish
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [7] Subacromial Surgery for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
    Smith, Matthew D.
    Nuelle, Clayton W.
    Hartzler, Robert U.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 40 (05): : 1394 - 1396
  • [8] Efficacy of continuous subacromial bupivacaine infusion for pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Schwartzberg, Randy S.
    Reuss, Bryan L.
    Rust, Randy
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (10) : 1320 - 1324
  • [9] Rotator Cuff and Subacromial Pathology
    Yablon, Corrie M.
    Jacobson, Jon A.
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 19 (03) : 231 - 242
  • [10] Complex topics in arthroscopic subacromial space and rotator cuff surgery
    Ryu, RKN
    Burkhart, SS
    Parten, PM
    Gross, RM
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (02): : 51 - 64