Mental health professionals' experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study

被引:22
|
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ,3 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [4 ,5 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Div Mental Hlth, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[4] Akershus Univ Hosp, Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[6] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision-making; Mental health care; Mental health professionals; Psychotic disorders; SERVICE USER INVOLVEMENT; SCHIZOPHRENIA; MEDICATION; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05949-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is a process whereby clinicians and patients work together to select treatments based on both the patient's preferences and clinical evidence. Although patients with psychotic disorders want to participate more in decisions regarding their care, they have limited opportunities to do so because of various barriers. Knowing about health professionals' experiences with SDM is important toward achieving successful implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore health professionals' SDM experiences with patients with psychotic disorders.MethodsThree focus group interviews were conducted, with a total of 18 health professionals who work at one of three Norwegian community mental health centres where patients with psychotic disorders are treated. We applied a descriptive and exploratory approach using qualitative content analysis.ResultsHealth professionals primarily understand the SDM concept to mean giving patients information and presenting them with a choice between different antipsychotic medications. Among the barriers to SDM, they emphasized that patients with psychosis have a limited understanding of their health situation and that time is needed to build trust and alliances. Health professionals mainly understand patients with psychotic disorders as a group with limited abilities to make their own decisions. They also described the concept of SDM with little consideration of presenting different treatment options. Psychological or social interventions were often presented as complementary to antipsychotic medications, rather than as an alternative to them.ConclusionHealth professionals' understanding of SDM is inconsistent with the definition commonly used in the literature. They consider patients with psychotic disorders to have limited abilities to participate in decisions regarding their own treatment. These findings suggest that health professionals need more theoretical and practical training in SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mental health professionals’ experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study
    Espen W. Haugom
    Bjørn Stensrud
    Gro Beston
    Torleif Ruud
    Anne S. Landheim
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [2] Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
    Espen W. Haugom
    Bjørn Stensrud
    Gro Beston
    Torleif Ruud
    Anne S. Landheim
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [3] Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
    Haugom, Espen W.
    Stensrud, Bjorn
    Beston, Gro
    Ruud, Torleif
    Landheim, Anne S.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [4] Health professionals' perspectives on shared decision-making in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study
    Lin, Chiu-Yi
    Renwick, Laoise
    Lovell, Karina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 31 (05) : 709 - 715
  • [5] User participation in decision-making - a qualitative intervention study on mental health professionals' experiences
    Kronkvist, Maria Bendtsen
    Forsberg, Karl-Anton
    Ramgard, Margareta
    Sandlund, Mikael
    Janarv, Tove
    Dahlqvist Jonsson, Patrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 21 (03) : 250 - 261
  • [6] Patients' experiences of shared decision-making in nursing care: A qualitative study
    Van Der Ploeg-Dorhout, Marianne Paulina
    Van Den Boogaard, Charina
    Reinders-Messelink, Heleen
    Van Der Cingel, Margreet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (06) : 2274 - 2286
  • [7] Chinese mental health professionals' perceptions of shared decision-making regarding people diagnosed with schizophrenia: A qualitative study
    Huang, Chongmei
    Lam, Louisa
    Zhong, Yaping
    Plummer, Virginia
    Cross, Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2021, 30 (01) : 189 - 199
  • [8] Perceptions and experiences of older patients and healthcare professionals regarding shared decision-making in pulmonary rehabilitation: A qualitative study
    Jiang, Yuyu
    Guo, Jianlan
    Sun, Pingping
    Chen, Zhongyi
    Liu, Fenglan
    Wang, Shanshan
    Ding, Zhaosheng
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (11) : 1627 - 1639
  • [9] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Fen-Fang Chung
    Pao-Yu Wang
    Shu-Chuan Lin
    Yu-Hsia Lee
    Hon-Yen Wu
    Mei-Hsiang Lin
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 20
  • [10] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Chung, Fen-Fang
    Wang, Pao-Yu
    Lin, Shu-Chuan
    Lee, Yu-Hsia
    Wu, Hon-Yen
    Lin, Mei-Hsiang
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)