Complex Span Versus Updating Tasks of Working Memory: The Gap Is Not That Deep

被引:204
|
作者
Schmiedek, Florian [1 ,2 ]
Hildebrandt, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Lovden, Martin [2 ,3 ]
Wilhelm, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
Lindenberger, Ulman
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Lifespan Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, Lund, Sweden
关键词
working memory; complex span tasks; n-back; fluid intelligence; structural equation modeling; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; REASONING ABILITY; AGE-DIFFERENCES; ADULT AGE; CAPACITY; INTELLIGENCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1037/a0015730
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How to best measure working memory capacity is an issue of ongoing debate. Besides established complex span tasks, which combine short-term memory demands with generally unrelated secondary tasks, there exists a set of paradigms characterized by continuous and simultaneous updating of several items in working memory, such as the n-back, memory updating, or alpha span tasks. With a latent variable analysis (N = 96) based on content-heterogeneous operationalizations of both task families, the authors found a latent correlation between a complex span factor and an updating factor that was not statistically different from unity (r = .96). Moreover, both factors predicted fluid intelligence (reasoning) equally well. The authors conclude that updating tasks measure working memory equally well as complex span tasks. Processes involved in building, maintaining, and updating arbitrary bindings may constitute the common working memory ability underlying performance on reasoning, complex span, and updating tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1096
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complex span versus binding tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep
    Hildebrandt, Andrea
    Schmiedek, Florian
    Loevden, Martin
    Wilhelm, Oliver
    Lindenberger, Ulman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 634 - 634
  • [2] Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks
    Redick, Thomas S.
    Broadway, James M.
    Meier, Matt E.
    Kuriakose, Princy S.
    Unsworth, Nash
    Kane, Michael J.
    Engle, Randall W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 28 (03) : 164 - 171
  • [3] Complex span tasks and hippocampal recruitment during working memory
    Faraco, Carlos Cesar
    Unsworth, Nash
    Langley, Jason
    Terry, Doug
    Li, Kaiming
    Zhang, Degang
    Liu, Tianming
    Miller, L. Stephen
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 55 (02) : 773 - 787
  • [4] Do working memory span and updating tasks measure the same thing? A twin study
    Friedman, Naomi
    Hewitt, John
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2013, 43 (06) : 518 - 518
  • [5] Ascending versus randomised list lengths in working memory span tasks
    St Clair-Thompson, Helen
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) : 335 - 341
  • [6] Which "working memory" are we talking about? Complex span tasks versus N-back
    Burgoyne, Alexander P.
    Frank, David J.
    Macnamara, Brooke N.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024,
  • [7] The Stability of Working Memory: Do Previous Tasks Influence Complex Span?
    Healey, M. Karl
    Hasher, Lynn
    Danilova, Elena
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2011, 140 (04) : 573 - 585
  • [8] The Beneficial Effect of Time in Simple and Complex Working Memory Span Tasks
    Oberauer, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2025,
  • [9] Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates
    Richmond, Lauren L.
    Burnett, Lois K.
    Morrison, Alexandra B.
    Ball, B. Hunter
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2022, 54 (02) : 780 - 794
  • [10] Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates
    Lauren L. Richmond
    Lois K. Burnett
    Alexandra B. Morrison
    B. Hunter Ball
    Behavior Research Methods, 2022, 54 : 780 - 794