Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures

被引:8
|
作者
Forman, Davis A. [1 ]
Abdel-Malek, Daniel [2 ]
Bunce, Christopher M. F. [2 ]
Holmes, Michael W. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Sci, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[3] Brock Univ, Fac Appl Hlth Sci, St Catharines, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
biceps brachii; forearm posture; joint angle; muscle length; spinal excitability; CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS PROVIDE; GOLGI TENDON ORGANS; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; UPPER-LIMB; UPPER EXTREMITY; ELBOW FLEXOR; HAND MUSCLES; CONTRACTION; ARM; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00620.2018
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Forearm rotation (supination/pronation) alters corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii, but it is unclear whether corticospinal excitability is influenced by joint angle. muscle length, or both. Thus the purpose of this study was to separately examine elbow joint angle and muscle length on corticospinal excitability. Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii was measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation. Spinal excitability was measured using cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited via transmastoid electrical stimulation. Elbow angles were manipulated with a fixed biceps brachii muscle length (and vice versa) across five unique postures: 1) forearm neutral, elbow flexion 90 degrees; 2) forearm supinated, elbow flexion 90 degrees; 3) forearm pronated, elbow flexion 90 degrees; 4) forearm supinated, elbow flexion 78 degrees; and 5) forearm pronated, elbow flexion 113 degrees. A musculoskeletal model determined biceps brachii muscle length for postures 1-3, and elbow joint angles (postures 4-5) were selected to maintain biceps length across forearm orientations. MEPs and CMEPs were elicited at rest and during an isometric contraction of 10% of maximal biceps muscle activity. At rest, MEP amplitudes to the biceps were largest during supination, which was independent of elbow joint angle. CMEP amplitudes were not different when the elbow was fixed at 90 degrees but were largest in pronation when muscle length was controlled. During an isometric contraction, there were no significant differences across forearm postures for either MEP or CMEP amplitudes. These results highlight that elbow joint angle and biceps brachii muscle length can each independently influence spinal excitability. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Changes in upper limb posture can influence the responsiveness of the central nervous system to artificial stimulations. We established a novel approach integrating neurophysiology techniques with biomechanical modeling. Through this approach, the effects of elbow joint angle and biceps brachii muscle length on corticospinal and spinal excitability were assessed. We demonstrate that spinal excitability is uniquely influenced by joint angle and muscle length, and this highlights the importance of accounting for muscle length in neurophysiological studies.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 423
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Elbow angle modulates corticospinal excitability to the resting biceps brachii at both spinal and supraspinal levels
    Donges, Siobhan C.
    Taylor, Janet L.
    Nuzzo, James L.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 104 (04) : 546 - 555
  • [2] KNEE EXTENSORS NEUROMUSCULAR FATIGUE CHANGES THE CORTICOSPINAL PATHWAY EXCITABILITY IN BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE
    Aboodarda, Saied Jalal
    Sambaher, Nemanja
    Millet, Guillaume Y.
    Behm, David G.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 340 : 477 - 486
  • [3] Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness and Topical Analgesic Alter Corticospinal Excitability of the Biceps Brachii
    Stefanelli, Lucas
    Lockyer, Evan J.
    Collins, Brandon W.
    Snow, Nicholas J.
    Crocker, Julie
    Kent, Christopher
    Power, Kevin E.
    Button, Duane C.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (11): : 2344 - 2356
  • [4] Corticospinal and Spinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii is Modulated Differently between Forward and Backward Arm Cycling
    Nippard, Anna
    Lockyer, Evan
    Button, Duane
    Power, Kevin
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2019, 33
  • [5] Effect of Forearm Postures and Elbow Joint Angles on Elbow Flexion Torque and Mechanomyography in Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Biceps Brachii
    Uwamahoro, Raphael
    Sundaraj, Kenneth
    Feroz, Farah Shahnaz
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (19)
  • [6] FORCE-LENGTH, TORQUE-ANGLE AND EMG-JOINT ANGLE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HUMAN IN-VIVO BICEPS BRACHII
    LEEDHAM, JS
    DOWLING, JJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 70 (05) : 421 - 426
  • [7] Effect of joint angle on mechanomyographic amplitude during unfused and fused tetani in the human biceps brachii muscle
    Naokazu Miyamoto
    Shingo Oda
    [J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2005, 95 : 221 - 228
  • [8] Changes in Corticospinal and Spinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii with a Neutral vs. Pronated Handgrip Position Differ between Arm Cycling and Tonic Elbow Flexion
    Forman, Davis A.
    Richards, Mark
    Forman, Garrick N.
    Holmes, Michael W. R.
    Power, Kevin E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [9] INFLUENCE OF CUTANEOUS JOINT AND MUSCLE AFFERENTS ON THE EXCITABILITY OF SPINAL AND CORTICAL MOTOR NEURONS
    KOMORI, T
    WATSON, BV
    BROWN, WF
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (09) : 876 - 876
  • [10] In-vivo muscle length-force-joint angle relationship for quasi-static muscle action of the biceps muscle
    Hossain, Zakir M.
    Pluta, M.
    Grill, W.
    [J]. HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2013, 2013, 8695