Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations

被引:5524
|
作者
O'Brien, Bridget C. [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Ilene B. [3 ]
Beckman, Thomas J. [4 ]
Reed, Darcy A. [4 ]
Cook, David A. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Off Res & Dev Med Educ, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Chicago Coll Med, Dept Med Educ, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin Online Learning, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Mayo Multidisciplinary Simulat Ctr, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; RESEARCH ARTICLES; USERS GUIDES; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; PERSPECTIVE; PROPOSAL; XXIII;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods. Method The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback. Results The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met. Conclusions The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1251
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting
    Pearson, Alan
    Jordan, Zoe
    Lockwood, Craig
    Aromataris, Ed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (05) : 670 - 676
  • [2] Reporting Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Implications for Health Design
    Peditto, Kathryn
    [J]. HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (02) : 16 - 19
  • [3] Understanding and Reporting Qualitative Research: An Analytical Review and Recommendations for Submitting Authors
    Koch, Lynn C.
    Niesz, Tricia
    McCarthy, Henry
    [J]. REHABILITATION COUNSELING BULLETIN, 2014, 57 (03) : 131 - 143
  • [4] Reporting Qualitative Research in Health Informatics: REQ-HI Recommendations
    Niazkhani, Zahra
    Pirnejad, Habibollah
    Aarts, Jos
    Adams, Samantha
    Bal, Roland
    [J]. USER CENTRED NETWORKED HEALTH CARE, 2011, 169 : 877 - 881
  • [5] Reporting qualitative research in health informatics: REQ-HI recommendations
    Department of Medical Informatics, Urmia University of Medical Science, Iran
    不详
    [J]. Stud. Health Technol. Informatics, (877-881):
  • [6] Reporting Qualitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 19 (04) : 1004 - 1012
  • [7] The Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic and Mixed Methods Research: Applying the Standards to Social Work Research
    White, Eleanor Bantry
    Hurley, Mary
    Suilleabhain, Fiachra O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 16 (05) : 469 - 477
  • [8] Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
    Tong, Allison
    Flemming, Kate
    McInnes, Elizabeth
    Oliver, Sandy
    Craig, Jonathan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [9] Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
    Allison Tong
    Kate Flemming
    Elizabeth McInnes
    Sandy Oliver
    Jonathan Craig
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12
  • [10] Literature Analysis on Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research in Cancer-related Studies
    Son, Haeng-Mi
    [J]. ASIAN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 23 (04) : 145 - 151