Decision Making in Liver Transplantation-Limited Application of the Liver Donor Risk Index

被引:14
|
作者
Mataya, Leslie [1 ]
Aronsohn, Andrew [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Thistlethwaite, J. Richard, Jr. [4 ,5 ]
Ross, Lainie Friedman [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Gastroenterol Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
RECIPIENT SURVIVAL; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; MODEL; VARIABLES; IMPACT; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/lt.23879
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The liver donor risk index (LDRI), originally developed in 2006 by Feng et al. and since modified, is a method of evaluating liver grafts from deceased donors through the determination of the relative risk of graft failure after transplantation. Online and paper surveys about attitudes and practices regarding decision making in liver transplantation and the role of the LDRI were sent to liver transplant physicians. One hundred forty-seven of 401 eligible respondents (37%) returned partial or complete surveys. The majority of the respondents were male (116/134 or 87%) and practiced in academic medical centers (128/138 or 93%). Transplant coordinators initially contacted the candidate with an offer in 81% of the programs. Eighty-eight of 143 respondents (62%) reported that they were very familiar with the LDRI, but the vast majority (114/137 or 83%) rarely or never discussed the concept of the LDRI with their patients. A majority of the respondents (96/132 or 73%) believed that the LDRI does not adequately describe a liver's relative risk of graft failure and that there are factors making the LDRI potentially misleading (122/138 or 88%). Nevertheless, 60 of 130 respondents (46%) believed that the LDRI would increase/improve shared decision making. The LDRI has not been widely adopted because of concerns that (1) it does not accurately reflect posttransplant survival, (2) it excludes relevant donor and recipient factors, and (3) it is too complicated for candidates to grasp. There is a need to improve it or to develop other decision-making tools to help promote shared decision making. There is also great diversity in how liver offers are made to ambulatory candidates and in how transplant programs address a candidate's refusal. Research is needed to determine evidence-based best practice. (C) 2014 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A donor risk index for liver transplantation
    Katy Cherry
    Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2006, 3 (6): : 298 - 299
  • [2] Restricted Role of the Liver Donor Risk Index in Shared Decision-Making.
    Mataya, L.
    Ross, L.
    Aronsohn, A.
    Thistlethwaite, J.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 731 - 732
  • [3] Restricted Role of the Liver Donor Risk Index in Shared Decision-Making.
    Mataya, L.
    Ross, L.
    Aronsohn, A.
    Thistlethwaite, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 731 - 732
  • [4] Kidney Donor Profile Index Is a Reliable Alternative to Liver Donor Risk Index in Quantifying Graft Quality in Liver Transplantation
    Scheuermann, Uwe
    Truong, Tracy
    Seyferth, Elisabeth R.
    Freischlag, Kyle
    Gao, Qimeng
    Yerxa, John
    Ezekian, Brian
    Davis, Robert P.
    Schroder, Paul M.
    Peskoe, Sarah B.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2019, 5 (12):
  • [5] Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: the Impact of the Donor Risk Index
    Franco, Edson
    Rodencal, Jason
    Agu, Ngozichukwuka
    Miladinovic, Branko
    Albers, Christopher
    Leone, John
    Osman-Mohamed, Hussein
    Bowers, Victor
    Kemmer, Nyingi
    Alsina, Angel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 91 - 91
  • [6] Developing a liver transplantation donor risk index in a national registry
    Dawwas, Muhammad F.
    David, Collett
    Barber, Kerri M.
    Watson, Christopher J.
    Neuberger, James M.
    Gimson, Alexander E.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (04) : 235A - 235A
  • [7] External validation of the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index on the French liver transplantation registry
    Winter, Audrey
    Feray, Cyrille
    Audureau, Etienne
    Ecochard, Rene
    Jacquelinet, Christian
    Roudot-Thoraval, Francoise
    Duvoux, Christophe
    Daures, Jean-Pierre
    Landais, Paul
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (08) : 1229 - 1238
  • [8] Donor Liver Attenuation Index and Liver Biopsy Correlation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Latif, A. M. E. R.
    Naz, S. U. M. B. U. L.
    Naseer, F. A. I. S. A. L.
    Alam, H. U. M. A. I. R. A.
    Bhatti, Muhammad Afzal
    Ashraf, S. H. A. H. Z. A. D.
    Rana, Muhammad Asim
    Hafeez, Muhammad Mansoor
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (07): : 1772 - 1775
  • [9] Decision making and risk perception-assessment of donors undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)
    Papachristou, Christina
    Schmid, Gabriele
    Walter, Marc
    Frommer, Joerg
    Klapp, Burghard F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 598 - 598
  • [10] Donor risk index and the risk of recurrent hepatitis C post liver transplantation
    Osowo, Ayodele
    Jeevanantham, Vinodh
    Yousfi, Amir
    Rakela, Jorge
    Carey, Elizabeth
    Byrne, Thomas
    Douglas, David
    Hugo, Vargas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 : 377 - 377