What Works Best for Whom? An Exploratory, Subgroup Analysis in a Randomized, Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of a Workplace Intervention in Low Back Pain Patients on Return to Work

被引:39
|
作者
Steenstra, Ivan A. [1 ,2 ]
Knol, Dirk L. [3 ]
Bongers, Paulien M. [1 ,4 ]
Anema, Johannes R. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
van Mechelen, Willem [1 ,5 ,7 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. W. [7 ]
机构
[1] TNO VU Univ Med Ctr, Res Ctr Phys Act Work & Hlth, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] TNO Work & Employment, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Res Ctr Insurance Med AMC UWV VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
low back pain; subgroups; moderators; return to work; workers; workplace intervention; HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION; SICK-LEAVE; PRIMARY MANAGEMENT; MULTISTAGE RETURN; GRADED ACTIVITY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; RELIABILITY; COST; RECURRENCE; PHYSIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a09631
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Exploratory subgroup analysis in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Objective. To detect possible moderators in the effectiveness of a workplace intervention in a population of workers with sick leave due to sub acute nonspecific low back pain. Summary of Background Data. In a recently published RCT, a workplace intervention was effective on return to work, compared to usual care. Examining the heterogeneity of effect sizes within the population in this RCT (n = 196) can lead to information on the effectiveness of the intervention in subgroups of patients. Methods. A subgroup analysis was performed by adding interaction terms to the statistical model. Before analysis the following possible moderators for treatment were identified: age, gender, pain, functional status, heavy work, and sick leave in the previous 12 months. Cox regression analyses were performed and survival curves were plotted. Results. The interaction (P = 0.02) between age (dichotomized at the median value) and the workplace intervention indicates a modifying effect. The workplace intervention is more effective for workers >= 44 years (HR, 95% CI = 2.5, [1.6, 4.1] vs. 1.2 [0.8, 1.8] for workers <44 years old). The interaction between sick leave in the previous 12 months and the workplace intervention is significant (P = 0.02). The intervention is more effective for workers with previous sick leave (HR, 95% CI = 2.8 [1.7, 4.9] vs. 1.3 [0.8, 2.0]). A modifying effect of gender, heavy work, and pain score and functional status on the effectiveness of this intervention was not found. Conclusion. The findings from these exploratory analyses should be tested in future RCTs. This workplace intervention seems very suitable for return to work of older workers and workers with previous sick leave. Gender, perceived heavy work, and baseline scores in pain and functional status should not be a basis for assignment to this intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What Works Best for Whom? An Exploratory, Subgroup Analysis in a Randomized, Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of a Workplace Intervention in Low Back Pain Patients on Return to Work Point of View
    Pransky, Glenn
    Cifuentes, Manuel
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (12) : 1250 - 1250
  • [2] Effectiveness of subgroup-specific pain rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic back pain
    Verra, Martin L.
    Angst, Felix
    Brioschi, Roberto
    Lehmann, Susanne
    Benz, Thomas
    Aeschlimann, Andre
    De Bie, Rob A.
    Staal, J. Bart
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (03) : 358 - 370
  • [3] Reduction in sick leave by a workplace educational low back pain intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial
    Ree, Eline
    Lie, Stein Atle
    Eriksen, Hege R.
    Malterud, Kirsti
    Indahl, Aage
    Samdal, Oddrun
    Harris, Anette
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 44 (06) : 571 - 579
  • [4] Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain
    Hlobil, H
    Staal, JB
    Spoelstra, M
    Ariëns, GAM
    Smid, T
    van Mechelen, W
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2005, 31 (04) : 249 - 257
  • [5] The effectiveness of 12 weeks of Pilates intervention on disability, pain and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Cruz-Diaz, David
    Romeu, Marta
    Velasco-Gonzalez, Carmen
    Martinez-Amatl, Antonio
    Hita-Contreras, Fidel
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (09) : 1249 - 1257
  • [6] Motivating disability pensioners with back pain to return to work - A randomized controlled trial
    Magnussen, Liv
    Strand, Liv I.
    Skouen, Jan S.
    Eriksen, Hege R.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2007, 39 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [7] An ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an Interdisciplinary return-to-work program in back pain patients
    Laeubli, Th.
    Klipstein, A.
    Norberg, M.
    Jeanrenaud, C.
    Bienlein, B.
    Canjuga, M.
    De-Goumoens, P.
    Joronon, H.
    Kern, F.
    Marti, J.
    Tomatis, L.
    Danuser, J.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (7-8) : 3S - 3S
  • [8] Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: Graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial
    Anema, Johannes R.
    Steenstra, Ivan A.
    Bongers, Paulien M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Loisel, Patrick
    van Mechelen, Willem
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (03) : 291 - 298
  • [9] Work hardening in chronic low back pain, a controlled randomized trial
    Alliger, K
    Kleist, B
    Winter, S
    Beyer, WF
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 295 - 295
  • [10] EFFECTIVENESS OF BACK SCHOOL FOR TREATMENT OF PAIN AND FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Sahin, Nilay
    Albayrak, Ilknur
    Durmus, Bekir
    Ugurlu, Hatice
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (03) : 224 - 229