Prophylactic dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcer related to the use of personal protective equipment by health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial

被引:22
|
作者
Gasparino, Renata Cristina [1 ]
Lima, Maria Helena Melo [1 ]
de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka [1 ]
da Silva, Vanessa Abreu [2 ]
de Jesus Meszaros, Mariana [2 ]
Antunes, Ivan Rogerio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Nursing, Rua Tessalia Vieira Camargo,126,Cidade Univ, BR-13083887 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Univ Hosp, Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
INJURIES; MASKS;
D O I
10.1111/wrr.12877
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Device-related pressure injury (DRPI) is a serious problem that is affecting professionals working on the front lines against COVID-19 due to the prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). In addition to the physical and psychological integrity of professionals, these injuries can compromise the quality of care. Therefore, using technologies to prevent this adverse effect is an urgent matter. This is a parallel two-arm randomized clinical trial without the use of a control group to compare the use of foam and extra-thin hydrocolloid in preventing DRPI associated with the use of PPE by health professionals working on the front lines against coronavirus. In total, 88 professionals were divided into two groups: foam and hydrocolloid. Data were collected using two instruments and related to demographic and professional characteristics and skin evaluation. Each volunteer received one of the dressings, both with the same dimensions and arranged over similar regions, and data were gathered at baseline and after 6 or 12 hours. Descriptive and inferential analytic statistical methods were used; the significance level adopted was 5%. No participant developed DRPI, but four areas with hyperemia were observed in the foam group (two in the forehead, one in the cheeks, and one in the nose bridge), as well as four areas with hyperemia in the hydrocolloid group (two in the nose bridge, one in the right ear, and one in the left ear). There was no difference between the groups regarding skin conditions and discomfort (P > .05). The average cost obtained was $ 5.8/person and $ 4.4/person in the foam group and the hydrocolloid group, respectively, considering the dressing measurements. The results show that foam and extra-thin hydrocolloid were effective in preventing DRPI associated with the use of PPE.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 188
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of recommended personal protective equipment among Brazilian health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Gir, Elucir
    de Oliveira e Silva, Ana Cristina
    Reis, Renata Karina
    Nasbine Rabeh, Soraia Assad
    Sorensen, William
    Nogueira, Wynne Pereira
    Palucci Marziale, Maria Helena
    Menegueti, Mayra Goncalves
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2022, 73 (01): : 69 - 78
  • [2] Knowledge and use of personal protective equipment by nursing professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic
    de Moura, Maria Sauanna Sany
    dos Santos e Silva, Renata Kelly
    Mendes, Priscila Martins
    Sousa, Antonia Sylca de Jesus
    Neto, Francisco Joao de Carvalho
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2021, 55 : 1 - 8
  • [3] PRESSURE INJURY RELATED TO THE USE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS WORKING IN THE CARE OF CRITICAL PATIENTS WITH COVID-19
    Conceicaode Gouveia Santos, Vera Lucia
    Nogueira, Paula C.
    Moraes, Juliano Teixeira
    Rocha, Geysiane
    Sebba Tosta de Souza, Diba Maria
    Figueiredo Coelho, Manuela Mendonca
    Serpa, Leticia Faria
    Vasconcelos Cavalcante, Viviane Mamede
    Pontes Fleury, Saskia Iasana
    da Silva, Santos Carneiro
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2022, 49 : S82 - S82
  • [4] COVID-19 and personal protective equipment: Treatment and prevention of skin conditions related to the occupational use of personal protective equipment
    Desai, Seemal R.
    Kovarik, Carrie
    Brod, Bruce
    James, William
    Fitzgerald, Matthew E.
    Preston, Ave
    Hruza, George J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 83 (02) : 675 - 677
  • [5] The use of personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic era
    Smereka, Jacek
    Szarpark, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07): : 1529 - 1530
  • [6] Headaches and the use of protective personal equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Oliveira, R.
    Gil Gouveia, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 : 700 - 700
  • [7] Symptoms Associated With Personal Protective Equipment Among Frontline Health Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Caglar, Ahmet
    Kacer, Ilker
    Hacimustafaoglu, Muhammet
    Ozturk, Berkant
    Ozturk, Kemal
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2022, 16 (03) : 987 - 990
  • [8] Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19
    Abiakam, Nkemjika
    Worsley, Peter
    Jayabal, Hemalatha
    Mitchell, Kay
    Jones, Michaela
    Fletcher, Jacqui
    Spratt, Fran
    Bader, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (03) : 312 - 322
  • [9] Prevention of facial injuries caused by personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Salome, Geraldo Magela
    Alves Dutra, Rosimar Aparecida
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 74
  • [10] Compliance with Personal Protective Equipment Use among Non-Medical Healthcare Professionals during Covid-19 Pandemic
    Diana, Estika Mei
    Widayanti, Anna Wahyuni
    INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2021, 32 (02): : 258 - 266