Laparoscopic and open live donor nephrectomy: a cost/benefit study

被引:31
|
作者
Berney, T [1 ]
Malaise, J [1 ]
Mourad, M [1 ]
Morel, P [1 ]
Squifflet, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Sch Med, Kidney & Pancreas Transplantat Unit, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
laparoscopy; kidney transplantation; live-donor nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2000.tb01033.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recently, laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy has been developed in order to increase organ donation. In this study we compare and review the records of 10 donors operated by open extraperitoneal approach and of 10 donors operated by a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach (LSC). Results show less use of postoperative parenteral narcotics in the LSC group (109 mg vs 272 mg; P < 0.0005) than in the extraperitoneal group. Morbidity was similar in both groups. There was no difference in postoperative stay. Allograft kidney function was similar in both groups until 6 months after donation. The use of disposable laparoscopic material bears an extra cost of 900 US$. We can thus conclude that laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure that significantly reduces postoperative pain, and is not detrimental to the allograft. The total cost of the laparoscopic procedure will be lower than that of the open approach if the length of postoperative stay is cut by 3 days.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: A cost-minimization analysis
    Dageforde, Leigh Anne
    Moore, Deonna R.
    Landman, Matthew P.
    Feurer, Irene D.
    Pinson, C. Wright
    Poulose, Benjamin
    Penson, David F.
    Moore, Derek E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 176 (02) : E89 - E94
  • [2] Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Flowers, JL
    Jacobs, S
    Cho, E
    Morton, A
    Rosenberger, WF
    Evans, D
    Imbembo, AL
    Bartlett, ST
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) : 483 - 489
  • [3] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study
    Buell, JF
    Lee, L
    Martin, JE
    Dake, NA
    Cavanaugh, TM
    Hanaway, MJ
    Weiskittel, P
    Munda, R
    Alexander, JW
    Cardi, M
    Peddi, VR
    Zavala, EY
    Berilla, E
    Clippard, M
    First, MR
    Woodle, ES
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 19 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [4] A prospective comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Lewis, GRR
    Waller, JR
    Baynes, JC
    Elwell, R
    White, SA
    Veitch, PS
    Nicholson, ML
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 : 56 - 56
  • [5] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the open operation
    Waller, JR
    Veitch, PS
    Nicholson, ML
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3787 - 3788
  • [6] Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy - Discussion
    Diethelm, AG
    Spencer, FC
    Hunter, J
    Sheil, AGR
    Burdick, JF
    Gadacz, TR
    Flowers, JL
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) : 489 - 490
  • [7] Comparison between open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Kaloucava, S.
    Mark, S.
    Davidson, P.
    Roake, J.
    Armstrong, S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 : 14 - 14
  • [8] Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the conventional open approach
    Brown, SL
    Biehl, TR
    Rawlins, MC
    Hefty, TR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03): : 766 - 769
  • [9] A randomised trial of open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Brook, NR
    Lewis, GRR
    Elwell, R
    Nicholson, ML
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 : 8 - 8
  • [10] Recipient outcome in laparoscopic vs open live donor nephrectomy
    Srivastava, Aneesh
    Anant, Kumar
    Dubey, Deepak
    Vivek, Vijjan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A98 - A98