What Is Citizen Science? - A Scientometric Meta-Analysis

被引:351
|
作者
Kullenberg, Christopher [1 ]
Kasperowski, Dick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Philosophy Linguist & Theory Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
TOOL; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Context The concept of citizen science (CS) is currently referred to by many actors inside and outside science and research. Several descriptions of this purportedly new approach of science are often heard in connection with large datasets and the possibilities of mobilizing crowds outside science to assists with observations and classifications. However, other accounts refer to CS as a way of democratizing science, aiding concerned communities in creating data to influence policy and as a way of promoting political decision processes involving environment and health. Objective In this study we analyse two datasets (N = 1935, N = 633) retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) with the aim of giving a scientometric description of what the concept of CS entails. We account for its development over time, and what strands of research that has adopted CS and give an assessment of what scientific output has been achieved in CS-related projects. To attain this, scientometric methods have been combined with qualitative approaches to render more precise search terms. Results Results indicate that there are three main focal points of CS. The largest is composed of research on biology, conservation and ecology, and utilizes CS mainly as a methodology of collecting and classifying data. A second strand of research has emerged through geographic information research, where citizens participate in the collection of geographic data. Thirdly, there is a line of research relating to the social sciences and epidemiology, which studies and facilitates public participation in relation to environmental issues and health. In terms of scientific output, the largest body of articles are to be found in biology and conservation research. In absolute numbers, the amount of publications generated by CS is low (N = 1935), but over the past decade a new and very productive line of CS based on digital platforms has emerged for the collection and classification of data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Citizen science in Russia through the Lens of the Scopus Database: Scientometric Analysis
    Busygina, Tatyana, V
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA NAUKI I TEHNOLOGIJ-SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01): : 126 - 159
  • [2] Scientometric Analysis of Research in Energy Efficiency and Citizen Science through Projects and Publications
    De Filippo, Daniela
    Luisa Lascurain, Maria
    Pandiella-Dominique, Andres
    Sanz-Casado, Elias
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [3] Meta-analysis and science
    Sohn, D
    [J]. THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 6 (02) : 229 - 246
  • [4] What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta -analysis
    Bolger, Michelle A.
    Lytle, Daniel J.
    Bolger, P. Colin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2021, 72
  • [5] Meta-Analysis and Conservation Science
    Kovaka, Karen
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2022, 89 (05) : 980 - 990
  • [6] META-ANALYSIS - SCIENCE OR RELIGION
    MEINERT, CL
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04): : S257 - S263
  • [7] The demerits of meta-analysis in science
    Bhattacharyya, Ranjan
    Ghosh, Avijit
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2022, 122 (12): : 1365 - 1366
  • [8] What ethics for citizen science?
    Ficorilli, Antonella
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2019, 43 (2-3): : 124 - 125
  • [9] Science Mapping of Meta-Analysis in Agricultural Science
    Ding, Weiting
    Li, Jialu
    Ma, Heyang
    Wu, Yeru
    He, Hailong
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2023, 14 (11)
  • [10] Development of Safety Training in Construction: Literature Review, Scientometric Analysis, and Meta-Analysis
    Lin, Jing
    Cai, Yuhang
    Li, Qinyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 39 (06)