Extended-release nifedipine and the risk of intestinal obstruction: a population-based study

被引:3
|
作者
Juurlink, David N. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hellings, Chelsea [1 ]
Gomes, Tara [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Huang, Anjie [1 ]
Paterson, J. Michael [1 ,4 ]
Urbach, David R. [1 ,4 ,7 ]
Mamdani, Muhammad M. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Leslie Dan Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Appl Hlth Res Ctr, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2014年 / 4卷 / 07期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
RETENTION; STRICTURE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005377
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the risk of bowel obstruction in older adults during treatment with extended-release nifedipine compared with patients treated with amlodipine. Design: Retrospective cohort study using multiple linked healthcare databases. Setting: Ontario, Canada from 1 April 1997 to 31 December 2010. Participants: We identified patients aged 66 years and older who started treatment with Adalat XL, an extended-release nifedipine product employing a tablet delivery system associated with mechanical bowel obstruction. For comparison, we studied patients receiving amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker that does not utilise the same delivery system and has not been implicated as a cause of bowel obstruction. Propensity score matching was used to ensure similarity of patients receiving the two drugs. Primary outcome measure: HR for the association between extended-release nifedipine relative to amlodipine and hospitalisation for bowel obstruction during therapy. Results: Over the 13-year study period, we identified 103 657 patients treated with extended-release nifedipine and 204 733 patients treated with amlodipine. In these two groups, 591 (0.6%) and 1185 (0.6%) of patients were hospitalised for bowel obstruction, respectively. We found no difference in the risk of bowel obstruction among patients treated with extended-release nifedipine compared with amlodipine (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24). Conclusions: Bowel obstruction during treatment with extended-release nidefipine is rare, and the risk is not appreciably greater than that during treatment with amlodipine.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条