Conspiracy theories and populist narratives: On the ruling techniques of Egyptian generals

Soon after the 2013 military coup, state-sponsored violence and human rights abuses have begun to shake Egyptian society. The regime of president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has attempted to rationalize them, claiming that this is the only path to save the most populous Middle Eastern country from civil unrest, terrorism, and economic decay. Al-Sisi, the former army chief during the 2013 coup, initially portrayed his ascendency to power as the only way to restore security and end the threat of terrorism. Egypt's generals have also recognized that they cannot rely only on the promise of restoring security to justify ending of the democratic opening (2011-2013) and their heavy-handed ruling techniques. Therefore, they have also been using a web of alternative narratives to justify their approach and have been spreading these narratives using security-controlled public and private media institutions. Conspiracy theories, defamation campaigns, and hate speech against voices of dissent have assumed central positions in this web. Increasingly, Egypt's generals have come to depend on notions of religious and nationalistic populism to tighten their grip on many aspects of societal lifeunder the pretense that they are ruling on behalf of ordinary citizens and attending to their needs.