Propagating aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in land cover change prediction process

被引:31
|
作者
Ferchichi, Ahlem [1 ]
Boulila, Wadii [1 ,2 ]
Farah, Imed Riadh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manouba, RIADI Lab, Natl Sch Comp Sci, Manouba, Tunisia
[2] Telecom Bretagne, ITI Dept, Brest, France
关键词
LCC prediction; Aleatory-epistemic uncertainty; Input parameters uncertainty; Model structure uncertainty; Parameter modeling; Parameter estimation; Correlation analysis; Uncertainty propagation; EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTIONS; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; FUZZY-SETS; CLASSIFICATION; MODEL; IMAGE; PARAMETERS; REDUCTION; FUSION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.11.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
An objective of satellite remote sensing is to predict or characterize the land cover change (LCC) over time. Sometimes we are capable of describing the changes of land cover with a probability distribution. However, we need sufficient knowledge about the natural variability of these changes, which is not always possible. In general, uncertainties can be subdivided into aleatory and epistemic. The main problem is that classical probability theory does not make a clear distinction between aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in the way they are represented, i.e., both of them are described with a probability distribution. The aim of this paper is to propagate the aleatory and epistemic uncertainty associated with both input parameters (features extracted from satellite image object) and model structure of LCC prediction process using belief function theory. This will help reducing in a significant way the uncertainty about future changes of land cover. In this study, the changes prediction of land cover in Cairo region, Egypt for next 16 years (2030) is anticipated using multi-temporal Landsat TM5 satellite images in 1987 and 2014. The LCC prediction model results indicated that 15% of the agriculture and 6.5% of the desert will be urbanized in 2030. We conclude that our method based on belief function theory has a potential to reduce uncertainty and improve the prediction accuracy and is applicable in LCC analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 37
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Propagating aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in land cover change prediction process (vol 37, pg 24, 2017)
    Ferchichi, A.
    Boulila, W.
    Farah, I. R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 43 : 231 - 231
  • [2] Sensitivity Analysis of Land Cover Change Prediction Model in the Presence of Aleatory and Epistemic Imperfection
    Ayadi, Zouhayra
    Boulila, Wadii
    Farah, Imed Riadh
    [J]. 2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ATSIP), 2016, : 549 - 554
  • [3] Sensitivity analysis approach to model epistemic and aleatory imperfection: Application to Land Cover Change prediction model
    Boulila, Wadii
    Ayadi, Zouhayra
    Farah, Imed Riadh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2017, 23 : 58 - 70
  • [4] Deterministic sampling for propagating epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in dynamic event tree analysis
    Rahman, S.
    Karanki, D. R.
    Epiney, A.
    Wicaksono, D.
    Zerkak, O.
    Dang, V. N.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 175 : 62 - 78
  • [5] Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification
    Dutta, Palash
    Ali, Tazid
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2015, 146 : 209 - 217
  • [6] Wear Prediction of a Mechanism With Joint Clearance Involving Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty
    Sun, Dongyang
    Chen, Guoping
    Wang, Tiecheng
    Sun, Rujie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (04):
  • [7] Relative contributions of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty sources in time series prediction
    Li, Chenzhao
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2016, 82 : 474 - 486
  • [8] On numerical representation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty
    Schjaer-Jacobsen, Hans
    [J]. EURODYN 2014: IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, : 3067 - 3071
  • [9] Mitigating versus Managing Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainty
    Packard, Mark D.
    Clark, Brent B.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 45 (04): : 872 - 876
  • [10] Simultaneous quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in GMPEs using Gaussian process regression
    Marcel Hermkes
    Nicolas M. Kuehn
    Carsten Riggelsen
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 12 : 449 - 466