Low-frequency cortical responses to natural speech reflect probabilistic phonotactics

被引:33
|
作者
Di Liberto, Giovanni M. [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Melnik, Gerda Ana [2 ,3 ]
de Cheveigne, Alain [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, UMR 8248, Lab Syst Perceptifs, Paris, France
[2] PSL Univ, Ecole Normale Super, Dept Etud Cognit, Paris, France
[3] CNRS, EHESS, ENS, Lab Sci Cognit & Psycholinguist, Paris, France
[4] UCL Ear Inst, London, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
cortical tracking; EEG; Language; Neighbourhood density; Phonemes; WORD SEGMENTATION; COMPONENT; CONSTRAINTS; ENTRAINMENT; PERCEPTION; PHONOLOGY; DYNAMICS; BRAIN; COMPREHENSION; WORDLIKENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.037
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Humans comprehend speech despite the various challenges such as mispronunciation and noisy environments. Our auditory system is robust to these thanks to the integration of the sensory input with prior knowledge and expectations built on language-specific regularities. One such regularity regards the permissible phoneme sequences, which determine the likelihood that a word belongs to a given language (phonotactic probability; "blick" is more likely to be an English word than "bnick"). Previous research demonstrated that violations of these rules modulate brain-evoked responses. However, several fundamental questions remain unresolved, especially regarding the neural encoding and integration strategy of phonotactics in naturalistic conditions, when there are no (or few) violations. Here, we used linear modelling to assess the influence of phonotactic probabilities on the brain responses to narrative speech measured with non-invasive EEG. We found that the relationship between continuous speech and EEG responses is best described when the stimulus descriptor includes phonotactic probabilities. This indicates that low-frequency cortical signals (<9 Hz) reflect the integration of phonotactic information during natural speech perception, providing us with a measure of phonotactic processing at the individual subject-level. Furthermore, phonotactics-related signals showed the strongest speech-EEG interactions at latencies of 100-500 ms, supporting a pre-lexical role of phonotactic information.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PHASE-LOCKED CORTICAL RESPONSES TO A HUMAN SPEECH SOUND AND LOW-FREQUENCY TONES IN THE MONKEY
    STEINSCHNEIDER, M
    AREZZO, J
    VAUGHAN, HG
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 1980, 198 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [2] Correlations in low-frequency BOLD fluctuations reflect cortico-cortical connections
    Lowe, MJ
    Dzemidzic, M
    Lurito, JT
    Mathews, VP
    Phillips, MD
    NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (05) : 582 - 587
  • [3] Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing
    Di Liberto, Giovanni M.
    O'Sullivan, James A.
    Lalor, Edmund C.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (19) : 2457 - 2465
  • [4] Atypical low-frequency cortical encoding of speech identifies children with developmental dyslexia
    Araujo, Joao
    Simons, Benjamin D.
    Peter, Varghese
    Mandke, Kanad
    Kalashnikova, Marina
    Macfarlane, Annabel
    Gabrielczyk, Fiona
    Wilson, Angela
    Di Liberto, Giovanni M.
    Burnham, Denis
    Goswami, Usha
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [5] SPEECH RECEPTION WITH LOW-FREQUENCY SPEECH ENERGY
    ROSENTHAL, RD
    LANG, JK
    LEVITT, H
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 57 (04): : 949 - 955
  • [6] SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY IN LOW-FREQUENCY NOISE
    PICKETT, JM
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1959, 31 (06): : 853 - 854
  • [7] Natural Low-Frequency Riblets
    Albert Gyr
    Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 1998, 60 : 235 - 255
  • [8] Natural low-frequency riblets
    Gyr, A
    FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 1998, 60 (03) : 235 - 255
  • [9] Low-frequency responses in dusty plasmas
    Marmolino, C
    De Angelis, U
    JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS, 2006, 72 (329-339) : 329 - 339
  • [10] LOW-FREQUENCY ENERGY DEFICIT IN ELECTROLARYNGEAL SPEECH
    QI, YY
    WEINBERG, B
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1991, 34 (06): : 1250 - 1256