The evaluation of creativity from the perspective of subject matter and training in higher education: Issues, constraints and limitations

被引:22
|
作者
Fischer, Stephanie [1 ]
Oget, David [2 ]
Cavallucci, Denis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille 3, Theodile Cirel, Domaine Univ Pont de Bois BP 60149, F-59653 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[2] INSA, LGeCo, 24 Blvd Victoire, F-67084 Strasbourg, France
关键词
Higher education; Evaluation; Creativity; Learning; Professionalization; PERSONALITY; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Creativity in organizations is presented as a phase of innovation and is a crucial issue at the core of the economic system. In the area of economics and management, it is acknowledged that auditing the creative process ensures the longevity and competitiveness of companies. Research indicates how creativity could be evaluated and controlled, but debate is intensive and many critiques have been formulated. In this article, we invite readers to consider an interdisciplinary approach emphasizing the importance of contextualizing research on the evaluation of creativity and the perspectives of training in higher education. From a discipline-oriented posture, evaluating creativity in research requires taking into account methodology frameworks and prudence with regard to social and cultural contexts. Creativity is addressed critically, primarily questioning its very definition and the aims of the evaluation. With regard to work on the subject, we explore the evaluation dimension of creativity and identify three potential invariants that could enter into interdisciplinary dialogue on the creative process. In the discussion, we address crucial points stemming from the learning process of creativity among engineering students in higher education where the challenge is to develop one's creative potential. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 135
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Addressing creativity in higher education from a rhizomatic perspective
    de Vries, E. W.
    Delnooz, P.
    Velthuijsen, H.
    Pinxten, R.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 60 (06) : 906 - 917
  • [2] Creativity Training in Higher Design Education
    Lau, Kung Wong
    [J]. DESIGN JOURNAL, 2009, 12 (02): : 153 - 169
  • [3] THE "TEACHER" SUBJECT IN CURRENT HIGHER EDUCATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PSYCHOANALYSIS
    Santos, Douglas Manoel Antonio de Abreu Pestana dos
    [J]. HUMANIDADES & INOVACAO, 2022, 9 (23): : 301 - 309
  • [4] Investigative training for higher education from an educational perspective
    Gonzalez Melo, Hamlet Santiago
    [J]. REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2011, (14): : 72 - 78
  • [5] ADDRESSING SERVICE QUALITY ISSUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION FROM THE STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVE
    Stukalina, Yulia
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2012, 18 (01) : 84 - 98
  • [6] Trends and issues in vocational education and training: A perspective from Europe
    Bertrand, O
    [J]. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 1996, : 14 - 29
  • [7] Incorporating STEAM activities into creativity training in higher education
    Gu, Xiaojing
    Tong, Dandan
    Shi, Peiqi
    Zou, Yuchen
    Yuan, Han
    Chen, Chen
    Zhao, Guoqing
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2023, 50
  • [8] Creativity and Innovation in Higher Education: A Palestinian Academic Perspective
    Abu Shokeedem, Sahar S.
    Barham, Kefah A.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 13 (04): : 2092 - 2098
  • [9] Axiological priorities of subject-subject interaction in higher education from the perspective of the cognitive paradigm
    Kamaleeva, Alsu R.
    Fakhrutdinova, Anastasia, V
    Kondrateva, Irina G.
    [J]. TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2022, (478): : 162 - 171
  • [10] Particularities of training teachers in higher education from an intercultural perspective
    Chiriac, Argentina
    Trebes, Tatiana
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADULT EDUCATION (CIEA 2018): EDUCATION FOR VALUES - CONTINUITY AND CONTEXT, 2018, : 417 - 422