Quality of government and the relationship between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: a cross-national study

被引:27
|
作者
Kulin, Joakim [1 ]
Seva, Ingemar Johansson [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Pro-environmental behavior; environmental concern; quality of government (QoG); ISSP; GENERALIZED TRUST; CIVIL-SOCIETY; COLLECTIVE ACTION; SOCIAL TRUST; CORRUPTION; DEMOCRACY; ACTIVISM; COUNTRY; SCIENCE; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/09644016.2020.1809160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Previous research consistently finds a relatively weak relationship between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior, as environmentally concerned individuals often fail to act pro-environmentally, both in the private and public spheres. While the strength of the concern-behavior relationship varies considerably across countries, existing research has yet to provide a complete account of these cross-national differences. In this study, we add to previous cross-national research on the concern-behavior relationship by focusing on the quality of government. Using multilevel analysis and data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), we demonstrate that people who are environmentally concerned are more likely to act pro-environmentally (in the public sphere), in countries where government institutions are fair, effective and impartial. We also find that people are generally more likely to engage in pro-environmental behavior in both the private and public sphere in countries where the quality of government is high.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 752
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-national variations in the gap between environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviors
    Tam, Kim-Pong
    Chan, Hoi-Wing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 560 - 560
  • [2] Relationship between global identity and pro-environmental behavior and environmental concern: a systematic review
    Pong, Vivien
    Tam, Kim-Pong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [3] Disease stresses and cross-national variations in gender difference in pro-environmental behavior
    Pong, Vivien
    Chan, Hoi-Wing
    Tam, Kim-Pong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 563 - 564
  • [4] Environmental Concern and Environmental Knowledge, Attitude toward Pro-Environmental Behavior as Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behavior: Evidence from Textile Industry in Indonesia
    Adam, Dini Hariyati
    Siregar, Zulkifli Musannip Efendi
    Elvina
    Supriadi, Yudi Nur
    Ende
    [J]. QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2021, 22 (182): : 138 - 144
  • [5] Runners' Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Role of Place Attachment and Environmental Concern
    Yamashita, Rei
    Bang, An
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2024, 9 (01) : 230 - 247
  • [6] The Relationship Between People's Environmental Considerations and Pro-environmental Behavior in Lithuania
    Balunde, Audra
    Perlaviciute, Goda
    Steg, Linda
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [7] Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence
    Tam, Kim-Pong
    Chan, Hoi-Wing
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 48 : 182 - 194
  • [8] The Politics of Environmental Concern: A Cross-National Analysis
    Nawrotzki, Raphael J.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 25 (03) : 286 - 307
  • [9] Examining the Relationship between Environmental Education and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Regular Basic Education Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gustavo Estrada-Araoz, Edwin
    Gallegos Ramos, Nestor Antonio
    Paredes Valverde, Yolanda
    Quispe Herrera, Rosel
    Mori Bazan, Jaime
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (05):
  • [10] The connection between subjective wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviour: Individual and cross-national characteristics in a seven-country study
    Capstick, Stuart
    Nash, Nicholas
    Whitmarsh, Lorraine
    Poortinga, Wouter
    Haggar, Paul
    Bruegger, Adrian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 133 : 63 - 73