Validation of the olfactory disorders questionnaire for English-speaking patients with olfactory disorders

被引:44
|
作者
Langstaff, Lorna [1 ]
Pradhan, Nisha [2 ]
Clark, Allan [3 ]
Boak, Duncan [4 ]
Salam, Mahmoud [5 ]
Hummel, Thomas [6 ]
Philpott, Carl M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] James Paget Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Norfolk Smell & Taste Clin, Gorleston NR31 6LA, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Fifth Sense, Chinnor, England
[5] Ipswich Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Ipswich, Suffolk, England
[6] Univ Dresden, Med Sch, Smell & Taste Clin, Dresden, Germany
关键词
anosmia; language; Nasal; odour; olfaction; quality of life; reliability; smell; taste; ODOR DISCRIMINATION; DYSFUNCTION; IDENTIFICATION; IMPAIRMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/coa.13351
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives To adapt the existing German language olfactory disorders questionnaire for use with English-speaking patients. To validate the adapted version for routine clinical use. Design The translated version of the original German questionnaire was revised with a patient and a clinician to reflect British language and culture. Patients attending an olfactory dysfunction clinic were recruited to perform the adapted questionnaire on two occasions at least 1 month apart. Additional online participants completed the questionnaire via the charity Fifth Sense. Main outcome measures Retest reliability of the English olfactory disorders questionnaire (eODQ) in affected patients including potential for redundancy in any of the included questions. Correlation of eODQ scores with Sniffin' Sticks scores. Results Eighty-seven patients reporting olfactory dysfunction were recruited and had a mean age of 48 with 35% of them being male; 50 datasets were available for analysis. A total of 957 members of the charity entered responses into the online questionnaire; 699 responses could be scored with participants' mean age of 55 years and with 69% reporting as female. The eODQ score and Sniffin' Sticks threshold, discrimination and identification score at timepoint 1 were correlated to assess for concurrent validity, (r = -0.15, P = 0.17) and showed no significant correlation. Female participants had a significantly higher mean total eODQ score than men, 55.75 compared to 52.28 (P = 0.001). The average score was 54.7 (SD 13.5) with a range from 26 to 87. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was good with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (confidence intervals 0.89, 0.91). Conclusions The results of this study support the use of the eODQ in a native English-speaking population and highlight the different distinctions between "objective" testing of olfaction with the Sniffin' Sticks test, and the patient reported impact of olfactory dysfunction on daily life. These two types of assessment can be easily administered in an outpatient setting and used in the assessment and management of olfactory dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 728
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders for Italian-speaking patients with olfactory dysfunction
    Vaira, Luigi Angelo
    Tirelli, Giancarlo
    Rizzo, Davide
    Uderzo, Francesco
    Avanzini, Francesco
    Trabalzini, Franco
    Rivelli, Nicoletta
    Burger, Doris
    Calabrese, Luca
    Solla, Paolo
    Bussu, Francesco
    Mayo-Yanez, Miguel
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    De Riu, Giacomo
    Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2024, 44 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [2] Validation of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders (QOD) for the Brazilian population
    Bernardino, Amanda Beatriz Costa da Silva
    Barreto-Filho, Marcio Andrade
    Pompeu, Amanda Savieto
    Andrade, Jaqueline dos Santos
    Azevedo, Amanda Canario Andrade
    Brasil, Michelle Queiroz Aguiar
    Cedro, Mariana
    Araujo, Cintia
    Andrade, Nilvano
    Akrami, Kevan
    Scussiatto, Henrique Ochoa
    Boaventura, Viviane Sampaio
    Fornazieri, Marco Aurelio
    CLINICS, 2024, 79
  • [3] Factor analysis of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
    Mattos, Jose L.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    DeConde, Adam S.
    Hyer, Madison
    Mace, Jess C.
    Smith, Timothy L.
    Soler, Zachary M.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2018, 8 (07) : 777 - 782
  • [4] A brief version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
    Mattos, Jose L.
    Edwards, Campbell
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Hyer, Madison
    Mace, Jess C.
    Smith, Timothy L.
    Soler, Zachary M.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2019, 9 (10) : 1144 - 1150
  • [5] Reliability and validity of a brief version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (brief QOD) in patients with olfactory dysfunction
    Zou, Laiquan
    Haehner, Antje
    Menzel, Susanne
    Gunder, Nadine
    Hummel, Thomas
    RHINOLOGY, 2022, 60 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [6] Validity and Reliability of the Malay Questionnaire for Olfactory Disorders
    Gima, Erica
    Lin, Carren Teh Sui
    Hassan, Nik Fariza Husna N. I. K.
    Yaacob, Najib Majdi
    Shukri, Norasnieda Md
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (06): : 156 - 166
  • [7] Adaptation and Validation of Portuguese Version of Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (PT-ODQ)
    Machado, Andre De Sousa
    Sousa, Francisco
    Costa, Joana
    Silva, Ana
    Pinto, Ana
    Simmen, Daniel
    Briner, Hans R.
    Meireles, Luis
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [8] A REEVALUATION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF OLFACTORY EPITHELIA IN PATIENTS WITH OLFACTORY DISORDERS
    YAMAGISHI, M
    NAKANO, Y
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1992, 249 (07) : 393 - 399
  • [9] Olfactory Function and Olfactory Disorders
    Hummel, T.
    Guerra, N. Power
    Gunder, N.
    Haehner, A.
    Menzel, S.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2023, 102 : S67 - S91
  • [10] Olfactory disorders: the patients' view
    Landis, Basile N.
    Stow, Nicholas W.
    Lacroix, Jean-Silvain
    Hugentobler, Marianne
    Hummel, Thomas
    RHINOLOGY, 2009, 47 (04) : 454 - 459