Comparing preference assessments: Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures

被引:16
|
作者
Kodak, Tiffany [1 ]
Fisher, Wayne W. [1 ]
Kelley, Michael E. [2 ]
Kisamore, April [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Munroe Meyer Inst, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ So Maine, Portland, ME 04103 USA
[3] Western Michigan Univ, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
关键词
Concurrent operants; Preference assessment; Reinforcer assessment; STIMULUS PREFERENCE; CHOICE ASSESSMENT; REINFORCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
In the current investigation, the results of a selection- and a duration-based preference assessment procedure were compared. A Multiple Stimulus With Replacement (MSW) preference assessment [Windsor, J., Piche, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455] and a variation of a Free-Operant (FO) preference assessment procedure [Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620] were conducted with four participants. A reinforcer assessment was conducted to determine which preference assessment procedure identified the item that produced the highest rates of responding. The items identified as most highly preferred were different across preference assessment procedures for all participants. Results of the reinforcer assessment showed that the MSW identified the item that functioned as the most effective reinforcer for two participants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1077
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks
    Worsdell, AS
    Iwata, BA
    Wallace, MD
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2002, 35 (03) : 287 - 290
  • [2] Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities
    Hagopian, LP
    Long, ES
    Rush, KS
    BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2004, 28 (05) : 668 - 677
  • [3] Partial order based approach to preference assessment in portfolio selection
    Zywica, Patryk
    Siwek, Joanna
    Stachowiak, Anna
    Kulhawczuk, Agata
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, FUZZ, 2023,
  • [4] Comparing methods of social preference assessment in childhood
    deMayo, Benjamin
    Olson, Kristina R.
    SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 33 (03)
  • [5] Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: Implications for preference assessments
    Roscoe, EM
    Iwata, BA
    Kahng, S
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1999, 32 (04) : 479 - 493
  • [6] Effects of Initial versus Frequent Preference Assessments on Skill Acquisition
    Leon, Yanerys
    Campos, Claudia
    Baratz, Stephania
    Gorman, Courtney
    Price, Amanda
    Deleon, Iser
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2024,
  • [7] AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACCESS DURATION ON PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES
    Jones, Brooke A.
    Dozier, Claudia L.
    Neidert, Pamela L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2014, 47 (01) : 209 - 213
  • [8] Development of a patient-based experience survey for preference assessment of gastrointestinal procedures
    Inadomi, JM
    Hornbuckle, K
    Bernard, L
    Tang, TS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (09): : S240 - S241
  • [9] Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers
    Bowman, LG
    Piazza, CC
    Fisher, WW
    Hagopian, LP
    Kogan, JS
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1997, 30 (03) : 451 - 458
  • [10] Statistical properties of duration-based VaR backtesting procedures in finite sample setting
    Malecka, Marta
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH PROFESSOR ALEKSANDER ZELIAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND FORECASTING OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PHENOMENA, 2013, : 91 - 98