A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Cholera Vaccination Programs in Beira, Mozambique

被引:18
|
作者
Jeuland, Marc [1 ]
Lucas, Marcelino
Clemens, John [2 ]
Whittington, Dale [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Int Vaccine Inst Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW | 2009年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
I1; H23; H4; ORAL CHOLERA; ENDEMIC CHOLERA; PRIVATE DEMAND; CONTINGENT VALUATION; MORTALITY; VACCINES; RISK; POPULATION; BANGLADESH; EPIDEMIC;
D O I
10.1093/wber/lhp006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Economic and epidemiological data collected in Beira, Mozambique, are used to conduct this first social cost-benefit analysis for cholera vaccination in Sub-Saharan Africa. The analysis compares the net economic benefits of three immunization strategies with and without user fees: school-based vaccination for school children only (age 5-14), school-based vaccination for all children (age 1-14), and a mass vaccination campaign for all people older than one year. All options assume the use of a low-cost new-generation oral cholera vaccine. The analysis incorporates the latest knowledge of vaccine effectiveness, including new evidence on the positive externality associated with the resulting herd protection (both protection of unvaccinated individuals and enhanced protection among vaccinated individuals arising from vaccination of a portion of the population). It also uses field data for incidence, benefits (private willingness to pay, public cost of illness), and costs (production, shipping, delivery, private travel costs). Taking herd protection into account has important economic implications. For a wide variety of parameters values, vaccination programs in Beira pass a cost-benefit test. Small school-based programs with and without user fees are very likely to provide net benefits. A mass vaccination campaign without user fees would result in the greatest reduction in the disease burden, but the social costs would likely outweigh the benefits, and such a program would require substantial public sector investment. As user fees increase, mass vaccination becomes much more attractive, and the reduction in disease burden remains above 70 percent at relatively low user fees.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 267
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit comparisons of investments in improved water supply and cholera vaccination programs
    Jeuland, Marc
    Whittington, Dale
    [J]. VACCINE, 2009, 27 (23) : 3109 - 3120
  • [2] COST-BENEFIT OF BCG VACCINATION PROGRAMS
    JOHNSTONE, T
    [J]. LANCET, 1980, 2 (8207): : 1302 - 1302
  • [3] COST-BENEFIT EVALUATIONS OF VACCINATION PROGRAMS
    CUTTING, WAM
    [J]. LANCET, 1980, 2 (8195): : 634 - 636
  • [4] Effectiveness of mass oral cholera vaccination in Beira, Mozambique
    Lucas, MES
    Deen, JL
    von Seidlein, L
    Wang, XY
    Ampuero, J
    Puri, M
    Ali, M
    Ansaruzzaman, M
    Amos, J
    Macuamule, A
    Cavailler, P
    Guerin, PJ
    Mahoudeau, C
    Kahozi-Sangwa, P
    Chaignat, C
    Barreto, A
    Songane, FF
    Clemens, JD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (08): : 757 - 767
  • [5] Estimating the private benefits of vaccination against cholera in Beira, Mozambique: A travel cost approach
    Jeuland, Marc
    Lucas, Marcelino
    Clemens, John
    Whittington, Dale
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 91 (02) : 310 - 322
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis of a PMTCT program in Mozambique
    Peffer, D
    Osman, NB
    Vaz, P
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2002, 25 (04) : 433 - 445
  • [7] Cost-Benefit Analysis of HPV Vaccination
    Lalonde, Andre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2007, 29 (08) : S43 - S49
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis of ergonomics programs
    Oxenburgh, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1997, 58 (02): : 150 - 156
  • [9] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF CONSERVATION PROGRAMS
    MACY, PP
    MADDAUS, WO
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1989, 81 (03): : 43 - 47
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis of conservation programs
    [J]. Macy, Peter P., 1600, (81):