Putting the 'Q' in depression QALYs: a comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D health related quality of life measures

被引:25
|
作者
Mann, Rachel [1 ]
Gilbody, Simon [1 ]
Richards, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
health related utility; EQ-5D; SF-6D; quality of life; outcomes measurement; SEVERITY; PHQ-9; COST; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00127-008-0463-5
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Generic health preference measures that capture quality of life improvements in depression are important for economic analysis of new technologies. To compare two widely used preference measures, the EQ-5D and SF-6D, in terms of their dimensions and health utility values. EQ-5D and SF-6D data collected from 114 patients with depression, who participated in a cluster, randomised controlled trial to evaluate a collaborative care intervention in UK, primary care practices. Utilities were examined across the whole sample and by level of depression severity using the PHQ-9. Depression was associated with disutility at baseline. At 3 month follow-up mean utility increased 0.147 for EQ-5D and 0.082 for SF-6D. Health gains were observed in patients in remission from depression and those with the mildest level of depression severity. Both generic preference measures were sensitive to health gains in depression within a relatively short follow-up period; larger health gain was observed for the EQ-5D.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 578
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Putting the ‘Q’ in depression QALYs: a comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D health related quality of life measures
    Rachel Mann
    Simon Gilbody
    David Richards
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2009, 44 : 569 - 578
  • [2] Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
    Walters, SJ
    Brazier, JE
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (06) : 1523 - 1532
  • [3] Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
    Stephen J. Walters
    John E. Brazier
    Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14 : 1523 - 1532
  • [4] Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in mental health patients
    Hakkaart, L.
    Lamers, L. M.
    Bouwmans, C. A. M.
    van Straten, A.
    Donker, M. C. H.
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 10 : S17 - S17
  • [5] The Responsiveness of Quality of Life Utilities to Change in Depression: A Comparison of Instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD)
    Gerhards, Sylvia A. H.
    Huibers, Marcus J. H.
    Theunissen, Kevin A. T. M.
    de Graaf, L. Esther
    Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : 732 - 739
  • [6] Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients
    Lamers, L. A.
    Bouwmans, C. A. M.
    van Straten, A.
    Donker, M. C. H.
    Hakkaart, L.
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (11) : 1229 - 1236
  • [7] Measuring health-related utility: Why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D?
    Bryan S.
    Longworth L.
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2005, 6 (3) : 253 - 260
  • [8] A Comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D Utility Scores in a Study of Patients with Schizophrenia
    McCrone, P.
    Patel, A.
    Knapp, M.
    Schene, A.
    Koeter, M.
    Amaddeo, F.
    Ruggeri, M.
    Giessler, A.
    Puschner, B.
    Thornicroft, G.
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 : S29 - S30
  • [9] COMPARISON OF THE SF-6D AND THE EQ-5D IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA
    Millier, A.
    Perthame, E.
    Aballea, S.
    Toumi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A294 - A294
  • [10] A Comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D Utility Scores in a Study of Patients with Schizophrenia
    McCrone, Paul
    Patel, Anita
    Knapp, Martin
    Schene, Aart
    Koeter, Maarten
    Amaddeo, Francesco
    Ruggeri, Mirella
    Giessler, Anne
    Puschner, Bernd
    Thornicroft, Graham
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01): : 27 - 31