Should future wind speed changes be taken into account in wind farm development?

被引:39
|
作者
Devis, Annemarie [1 ,2 ]
Van Lipzig, Nicole P. M. [1 ]
Demuzere, Matthias [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Celestijnenlaan 200 E, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Storm, Katwilgweg 2, B-2050 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Lab Hydrol & Water Management, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2018年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
wind energy; climate change; wind turbine; Earth system models; Europe; wind resource assessment; multimodel ensemble; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY POTENTIALS; EUROPE; CMIP5; MODEL; IMPACTS; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aabff7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate wind resource assessments are crucial in the development of wind farmprojects. However, it is common practice to estimate the wind yield over the next 20 years from short-term measurements and reanalysis data of the past 20 years, even though wind climatology is expected to change under the future climate. The present work examines future changes in wind power output over Europe using an ensemble of ESMs. The power output is calculated using the entire wind speed PDF and a non-constant power conversion coefficient. Based on this method, the ESM ensemble projects changes in near-future power outputs with a spatially varying magnitude between -12% and 8%. The most extreme changes occur over theMediterranean region. For the first time, the sensitivity of these future change in power output to the type of wind turbine is also investigated. The analysis reveals that the projected wind power changes may vary in up to half of their magnitude, depending on the type of turbine and region of interest. As such, we recommend that wind industries fully account for projected near-future changes in wind power output by taking them into account as a well-defined loss/gain and uncertainty when estimating the yield of a future wind farm.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Short Circuit Study of an Induction Generator Wind Farm Considering Wind Speed Changes
    Aghaebrahimi, M. R.
    Amiri, M.
    Moghaddam, M. Kamali
    2008 40TH NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM (NAPS 2008), 2008, : 69 - +
  • [2] WIND SPEED FORECASTING BASED ON FNN IN WIND FARM
    Fu, Zhengning
    Xie, Hongwen
    MATERIAL SCIENCE, CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE SCIENCE, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY II, 2014, 651-653 : 1117 - +
  • [3] Wind farm equivalence method considering wind speed
    Li, Hongmei
    Wan, Qiulan
    Xiang, Changming
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2013, 33 (01): : 121 - 123
  • [4] Calibration of a Wind Farm Wind Speed Model With Incomplete Wind Data
    Hosseini, S. Hossein
    Tang, Choon Yik
    Jiang, John N.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 5 (01) : 343 - 350
  • [5] Prediction models for wind speed at turbine locations in a wind farm
    Knudsen, Torben
    Bak, Thomas
    Soltani, Mohsen
    WIND ENERGY, 2011, 14 (07) : 877 - 894
  • [6] ARIMA Modeling of Wind Speed for Wind Farm Reliability Analysis
    Rajeevan, A. K.
    Shouri, P. V.
    Nair, Usha
    2014 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING RESEARCH AREAS: MAGNETICS, MACHINES AND DRIVES (AICERA/ICMMD), 2014,
  • [7] A Scenario Technology Applied to Wind Speed Simulation in Wind Farm
    Pan WenXia
    Zhou JianWen
    Wang Fei
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY (POWERCON), 2014,
  • [8] Multiscale prediction of wind speed and output power for the wind farm
    Wang X.
    LI H.
    Wang, X. (Wangzt@lut.cn), 1600, South China University of Technology (10): : 251 - 258
  • [9] Wind speed forecasting based on data mining in wind farm
    Wang, Cuiru
    Wang, Qile
    Mei, Huawei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, 2008, : 145 - 151
  • [10] Deep generative model for probabilistic wind speed and wind power estimation at a wind farm
    Salazar, Andres A.
    Zheng, Jiafeng
    Che, Yuzhang
    Xiao, Feng
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (06) : 1855 - 1873