Segment-specific requirements for dorsoventral patterning genes during early brain development in Drosophila

被引:15
|
作者
Urbach, Rolf [1 ]
Volland, Dagmar [1 ]
Seibert, Janina [1 ]
Technau, Gerhard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Genet, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
来源
DEVELOPMENT | 2006年 / 133卷 / 21期
关键词
CNS; brain; neuroectoderm; neuroblasts; dorsoventral patterning; cell fate; vnd; msh; ind; glia; Drosophila;
D O I
10.1242/dev.02605
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An initial step in the development of the Drosophila central nervous system is the delamination of a stereotype population of neural stem cells (neuroblasts, NBs) from the neuroectoderm. Expression of the columnar genes ventral nervous system defective (vnd), intermediate neuroblasts defective (ind) and muscle segment homeobox (msh) subdivides the truncal neuroectoderm (primordium of the ventral nerve cord) into a ventral, intermediate and dorsal longitudinal domain, and has been shown to play a key role in the formation and/or specification of corresponding NBs. In the procephalic neuroectoderm (pNE, primordium of the brain), expression of columnar genes is highly complex and dynamic, and their functions during brain development are still unknown. We have investigated the role of these genes ( with special emphasis on the Nkx2-type homeobox gene vnd) in early embryonic development of the brain. We show at the level of individually identified cells that vnd controls the formation of ventral brain NBs and is required, and to some extent sufficient, for the specification of ventral and intermediate pNE and deriving NBs. However, we uncovered significant differences in the expression of and regulatory interactions between vnd, ind and msh among brain segments, and in comparison to the ventral nerve cord. Whereas in the trunk Vnd negatively regulates ind, Vnd does not repress ind (but does repress msh) in the ventral pNE and NBs. Instead, in the deutocerebral region, Vnd is required for the expression of ind. We also show that, in the anterior brain (protocerebrum), normal production of early glial cells is independent from msh and vnd, in contrast to the posterior brain (deuto- and tritocerebrum) and to the ventral nerve cord.
引用
收藏
页码:4315 / 4330
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dorsoventral patterning in the early embryonic brain of Drosophila
    Seibert, Janina
    Technau, Gerd
    Urbach, Rolf
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 2006, 20 (3-4) : 217 - 218
  • [2] Dorsoventral patterning in the developing brain of Drosophila
    Seibert, Janina
    Volland, Dagmar
    Technau, Gerhard M.
    Urbach, Rolf
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 2009, 23 : S19 - S19
  • [3] SEGMENT-SPECIFIC EXPRESSION OF THE NEURONATIN GENE DURING EARLY HINDBRAIN DEVELOPMENT
    WIJNHOLDS, J
    CHOWDHURY, K
    WEHR, R
    GRUSS, P
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1995, 171 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [4] Neuroblast formation and patterning during early brain development in Drosophila
    Urbach, R
    Technau, GM
    BIOESSAYS, 2004, 26 (07) : 739 - 751
  • [5] Segment-specific regulation of the Drosophila AP-2 gene during leg and antennal development
    Ahn, Youngwook
    Zou, Jizhong
    Mitchell, Pamela J.
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 355 (02) : 336 - 348
  • [6] Segment-Specific Cyst Index (SSCI): A Quantitative Analysis of Segment-Specific Responses during Cystogenesis
    Akman, Zafer
    Kakade, Vijayakumar R.
    Cantley, Lloyd G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 35 (10):
  • [7] CELL PATTERNING AND SEGMENT POLARITY GENES IN DROSOPHILA
    INGHAM, PW
    NAKANO, Y
    DEVELOPMENT GROWTH & DIFFERENTIATION, 1990, 32 (06) : 563 - 574
  • [8] ORB IS REQUIRED FOR ANTEROPOSTERIOR AND DORSOVENTRAL PATTERNING DURING DROSOPHILA OOGENESIS
    CHRISTERSON, LB
    MCKEARIN, DM
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 8 (05) : 614 - 628
  • [9] Hox gene control of segment-specific bristle patterns in Drosophila
    Rozowski, M
    Akam, M
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 16 (09) : 1150 - 1162
  • [10] Segment polarity genes and cell patterning within the Drosophila body segment
    Ingham, Philip W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 1 (02) : 261 - 267