Reliability and validity of risk analysis

被引：97
|
作者：
Aven, Terje [1 ]
Heide, Bjornar [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
来源：
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY | 2009年 / 94卷 / 11期
关键词：
Scientific requirements; Reliability and validity; Risk analysis; Probability of frequency approach; Bayesian approaches; SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; PROBABILITY; RECONCILIATION;
D O I：
10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.003
中图分类号：
T [工业技术];
学科分类号：
08 ;
摘要：
In this paper we investigate to what extent risk analysis meets the scientific quality requirements of reliability and validity. We distinguish between two types of approaches within risk analysis, relative frequency-based approaches and Bayesian approaches. The former category includes both traditional statistical inference methods and the so-called probability of frequency approach. Depending on the risk analysis approach, the aim of the analysis is different, the results are presented in different ways and consequently the meaning of the concepts reliability and validity are not the same. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1862 / 1868
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PROTOCOL ANALYSIS
    SMAGORINSKY, P
    WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 1989, 6 (04) : 463 - 479
  • [2] Reliability is not validity and validity is not reliability
    Schmidt, FL
    Viswesvaran, C
    Ones, DS
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (04) : 901 - 912
  • [3] On the reliability and validity of ship-ship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk
    Goerlandt, Floris
    Kujala, Pentti
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 62 : 348 - 365
  • [4] Validity and reliability analysis of the Turkish version of pediatric nutritional risk score scale
    Tasci, Onur
    Soylu, Ozlem Bekem
    Tasci, Ezgi Kiran
    Eser, Erhan
    Orucoglu, Betul
    Gunay, Ilker
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 31 (04): : 324 - 330
  • [5] The Student Risk Screening Scale: A Reliability and Validity Generalization Meta-Analysis
    Kilgus, Stephen P.
    Eklund, Katie
    Maggin, Daniel M.
    Taylor, Crystal N.
    Allen, Amanda N.
    JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2018, 26 (03) : 143 - 155
  • [6] The Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Stalking Risk Profile
    McEwan, Troy E.
    Shea, Daniel E.
    Daffern, Michael
    MacKenzie, Rachel D.
    Ogloff, James R. P.
    Mullen, Paul E.
    ASSESSMENT, 2018, 25 (02) : 259 - 276
  • [7] Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis
    Potter, WJ
    Levine-Donnerstein, D
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1999, 27 (03) : 258 - 284
  • [8] Interrater Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Predictive Validity of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol
    Vargen, Lee M.
    Jackson, Karla J.
    Hart, Stephen D.
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 44 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [9] Sexual risk cognitions questionnaire: A reliability and validity study
    Shah, D
    Thornton, S
    Burgess, AP
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 1997, 9 (04): : 471 - 480
  • [10] Establishing reliability and validity of a constipation risk assessment scale
    Richmond, Janice P.
    Wright, Marion E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2008, 12 (3-4) : 139 - 150
12345