Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT), a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after a second or subsequent episode of self-harm

被引:19
|
作者
Wright-Hughes, Alexandra [1 ]
Graham, Elizabeth [1 ]
Farrin, Amanda [1 ]
Collinson, Michelle [1 ]
Boston, Paula [2 ]
Eisler, Ivan [3 ]
Fortune, Sarah [2 ]
Green, Jonathan [4 ]
House, Allan [2 ]
Owens, David [2 ]
Simic, Mima [3 ]
Tubeuf, Sandy [2 ]
Nixon, Jane [1 ]
McCabe, Christopher [5 ]
Kerfoot, Michael [4 ]
Cottrell, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Clin Trials Res, Leeds LS2 9LJ, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds LS2 9LJ, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Acad Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
来源
TRIALS | 2015年 / 16卷
关键词
Self-harm; suicide; young people; child and adolescent mental health; family therapy; randomised controlled trial; ADOLESCENT SUICIDE; RISK-FACTORS; EXPRESSED EMOTION; BEHAVIOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPETITION; CHILDREN; VALIDITY; ENGLAND; SCALE;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-015-1007-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Self-harm is common in the community with a lifetime prevalence of 13 %. It is associated with an elevated risk of overall mortality and suicide. People who harm themselves are high users of public services. Estimates of the 1-year risk of repetition vary between 5 and 15 % per year. Currently, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of clinical interventions for young people who engage in self-harm. Recent reviews have failed to demonstrate any effect on reducing repetition of self-harm among adolescents receiving a range of treatment approaches. Family factors are particularly important risk factors associated with fatal and non-fatal self-harm among children and adolescents. Family therapy focuses on the relationships, roles and communication patterns between family members, but there have been relatively few studies of specifically family-focused interventions with this population. The Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT) Trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (grant no. 07/33/01) following a commissioned call for this research. Methods/Design: SHIFT is a pragmatic, phase III, multicentre, individually randomised, controlled trial comparing Family Therapy (FT) with treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents aged 11 to 17 who have engaged in at least two episodes of self-harm. Both therapeutic interventions were delivered within the National Health Service (NHS) Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England. Participants and therapists were, of necessity, aware of treatment allocation, but the researchers were blind to the allocations to allow unbiased collection of follow-up data. Primary outcome data (repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance 18 months post-randomisation) were collected from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), augmented by directed searches of medical records at Acute Trusts. Secondary outcome data (including suicidal intent, depression, hopelessness and health economics) were collected at 12 and 18 months post-randomisation via researcher-participant interviews and by post at 3 and 6 months. Discussion: SHIFT will provide a well-powered evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of Family Therapy for young people who have self-harmed on more than one occasion. The study will be reported in 2016, and the results will inform clinical practice thereafter.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT), a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after a second or subsequent episode of self-harm 
    Alexandra Wright-Hughes
    Elizabeth Graham
    Amanda Farrin
    Michelle Collinson
    Paula Boston
    Ivan Eisler
    Sarah Fortune
    Jonathan Green
    Allan House
    David Owens
    Mima Simic
    Sandy Tubeuf
    Jane Nixon
    Christopher McCabe
    Michael Kerfoot
    David Cottrell
    Trials, 16
  • [2] A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after second or subsequent episodes of self-harm: the Self-Harm Intervention - Family Therapy (SHIFT) trial
    Cottrell, David J.
    Wright-Hughes, Alex
    Collinson, Michelle
    Boston, Paula
    Eisler, Ivan
    Fortune, Sarah
    Graham, Elizabeth H.
    Green, Jonathan
    House, Allan O.
    Kerfoot, Michael
    Owens, David W.
    Saloniki, Eirini-Christina
    Simic, Mima
    Tubeuf, Sandy
    Farrin, Amanda J.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (12) : 1 - +
  • [3] Effectiveness of systemic family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people after self-harm: a pragmatic, phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Cottrell, David J.
    Wright-Hughes, Alexandra
    Collinson, Michelle
    Boston, Paula
    Eisler, Ivan
    Fortune, Sarah
    Graham, Elizabeth H.
    Green, Jonathon
    House, Allan O.
    Kerfoot, Michael
    Owens, David W.
    Saloniki, Eirini-Christina
    Simic, Mima
    Lambert, Fiona
    Rothwell, Justine
    Tubeuf, Sandy
    Farrin, Amanda J.
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 5 (03): : 203 - 216
  • [4] The Relational Approach to Treating Self-Harm (RELATE): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial study of cognitive analytic therapy for adults who self-harm versus treatment at usual
    Taylor, Peter James
    Adeyemi, Isabel
    Marlow, Katie
    Cottam, Sarah
    Airnes, Zerena
    Hartley, Samantha
    Howells, Victoria
    Dunn, Barnaby D.
    Elliott, Rachel A.
    Hann, Mark
    Latham, Cameron
    Robinson, Catherine
    Turpin, Clive
    Kellett, Stephen
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [5] Longer-term effectiveness of systemic family therapy compared with treatment as usual for young people after self-harm: An extended follow up of pragmatic randomised controlled trial
    Cottrell, D. J.
    Wright-Hughes, A.
    Eisler, I
    Fortune, S.
    Green, J.
    House, A. O.
    Kerfoot, M.
    Owens, D. W.
    Simic, M.
    McLellan, V
    Tubeuf, S.
    Farrin, A. J.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 18
  • [6] Long-term cost-utility analysis of family therapy vs. treatment as usual for young people seen after self-harm
    Bojke, Chris
    Cottrell, David
    Wright-Hughes, Alex
    Farrin, Amanda
    Tubeuf, Sandy
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [7] Beating Adolescent Self-Harm (BASH): a randomised controlled trial comparing usual care versus usual care plus a smartphone self-harm prevention app (BlueIce) in young adolescents aged 12-17 who self-harm: study protocol
    Greenhalgh, Isobel
    Tingley, Jessica
    Taylor, Gordon
    Medina-Lara, Antonieta
    Rhodes, Shelley
    Stallard, P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [8] Systemic family therapy is not superior to treatment as usual in preventing repeat self-harm in adolescents
    Aggarwal, Shilpa
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 22 (02) : E9 - +
  • [9] Postcard intervention for repeat self-harm: randomised controlled trial
    Beautrais, Annette L.
    Gibb, Sheree J.
    Faulkner, Alan
    Fergusson, David M.
    Mulder, Roger T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 197 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [10] The end of family therapy for self-harm, or a new beginning?
    Ougrin, Dennis
    Asarnow, Joan R.
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 5 (03): : 188 - 189