Mucosal Sparing Radiation Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Gamez, Mauricio E. [1 ]
Halyard, Michele Y. [1 ]
Hinni, Michael L. [2 ]
Hayden, Richard E. [2 ]
Nagel, Thomas H. [2 ]
Vargas, Carlos E. [1 ]
Wong, William W. [1 ]
Curtis, Kelly K. [3 ]
Zarka, Matthew A. [4 ]
Ma, Daniel [5 ]
Patel, Samir H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Otolaryngol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol Med Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Med Pathol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
来源
关键词
oropharyngeal cancer; human papillomavirus; transoral laser and robotics surgery; TLM and TORS; mucosal sparing radiation therapy; clinical outcomes research; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; TRANSORAL-LASER-MICROSURGERY; NECK-CANCER; POSTOPERATIVE IRRADIATION; ADJUVANT THERAPY; SELECTIVE NECK; ORAL-CAVITY; TONGUE BASE; CHEMO-IMRT; HEAD;
D O I
10.1177/0003489416681580
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report the outcomes of patients with favorable risk oropharyngeal cancer that underwent adjuvant radiation therapy with omission of the primary site from the clinical target volume (CTV). Material/ Methods: A retrospective study of 40 patients treated with transoral surgery (TOS) followed by neck only radiation using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with exclusion of the primary site. For all patients, a CTV of the primary surgical bed was contoured to obtain the estimated incidental dose to the primary site. Results: Median follow-up was 51 months (range, 13-155 months). The median radiation therapy (RT) dose to the neck was 6000 cGy (range, 5400-6400 cGy). The mean incidental dose to the primary tonsillar site was 4320 cGy (SD +/- 480 cGy) and to the primary base of tongue site was 4060 cGy (SD +/- 420 cGy). There were no local failures and only 1 regional failure, resulting in 97.5% locoregional control rate at 4 years. Two patients developed distant metastases, without evidence of locoregional recurrence, for a 4-year overall survival rate of 97%. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that mucosal sparing RT after TOS in favorable risk oropharyngeal cancer patients may provide comparable oncologic and improved functional outcomes compared to conventional treatment in selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcomes With Mucosal Sparing Radiation Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Gamez, M. E.
    Halyard, M. Y.
    Hinni, M. L.
    Richard, H. E.
    Nagel, T. H.
    Vargas, C.
    Wong, W. W.
    Curtis, K.
    Zarka, M. A.
    Patel, S. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (04): : 884 - 884
  • [2] A Prospective Study of Mucosal Sparing Radiation Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients
    Anderson, Justin D.
    DeWees, Todd A.
    Ma, Daniel J.
    Nagel, Thomas H.
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Moore, Eric J.
    Rwigema, Jean Claude M.
    Routman, David M.
    Wittich, Michelle Neben
    McGee, Lisa A.
    Hayden, Richard E.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Golafshar, Michael
    Gamez, Mauricio E.
    Lester, Scott C.
    Anand, Aman
    Crujido, Lisa R.
    Halyard, Michele Y.
    Hinni, Michael L.
    Patel, Samir H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 115 (01): : 192 - 201
  • [3] A Prospective Study of Mucosal Sparing Proton Beam Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients
    Patel, S. H.
    Ma, D. J.
    Nagel, T. H.
    Moore, E. J.
    Rwigema, J. C.
    Neben-Wittich, M. A.
    McGee, L. A.
    Hayden, R. E.
    Foote, R. L.
    Crujido, L. R.
    DeWees, T. A.
    Golafshar, M. A.
    Anand, A.
    Halyard, M. Y.
    Hinni, M. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 112 (05): : E13 - E14
  • [4] A Prospective Study of Mucosal Sparing Proton Beam Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients: Toxicity, Quality of Life and Swallow Function
    Patel, S. H.
    Ma, D. J.
    Nagel, T. H.
    Moore, E. J.
    Rwigema, J. C. M.
    Neben-Wittich, M. A.
    McGee, L. A.
    Hayden, R. E.
    Foote, R. L.
    Crujido, L. R.
    DeWees, T. A.
    Golafshar, M. A.
    Anand, A.
    Halyard, M. Y.
    Hinni, M. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S161 - S162
  • [5] Larynx-sparing techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer
    Bar Ad, Voichita
    Lin, Haibo
    Hwang, Wei-Ting
    Deville, Curtiland
    Dutta, Pinaki R.
    Tochner, Zelig
    Both, Stefan
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (04) : 383 - 386
  • [6] Radiation therapy for oligometastatic oropharyngeal cancer
    Martini, Stefania
    Arcadipane, Francesca
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    Iorio, Giuseppe C.
    Bartoncini, Sara
    Gallio, Elena
    Guarneri, Alessia S.
    Ricardi, Umberto
    BJR CASE REPORTS, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [7] RADIATION-THERAPY FOR OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER
    WANG, CC
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1995, 105 (11): : 1258 - 1258
  • [8] Intraoperative radiation therapy in resected bile duct cancer
    Willett, CG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (03): : 523 - 524
  • [9] Regional Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer in the HPV Era
    Tam, Moses
    Hu, Kenneth
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 29 (02) : 126 - 136
  • [10] Intraoperative radiation therapy for curatively resected rectal cancer
    Sadahiro, S
    Suzuki, T
    Ishikawa, K
    Yasuda, S
    Tajima, T
    Makuuchi, H
    Murayama, C
    Ohizumi, Y
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (11) : 1689 - 1695