Prediction error minimization: Implications for Embodied Cognition and the Extended Mind Hypothesis

被引:8
|
作者
de Bruin, Leon [1 ]
Michael, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Philosophy, Erasmuspl 1, NL-6500 HD Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Cent European Univ Budapest, Dept Cognit Sci, Frankel Leo Ut 30-34, H-1023 Budapest, Hungary
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Prediction error minimization; Embodied Cognition; Extended Mind Hypothesis; DOPAMINE NEURONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2016.01.009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Over the past few years, the prediction-error minimization (PEM) framework has increasingly been gaining ground throughout the cognitive sciences. A key issue dividing proponents of PEM is how we should conceptualize the relation between brain, body and environment. Clark advocates a version of PEM which retains, at least to a certain extent, his prior commitments to Embodied Cognition and to the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Hohwy, by contrast, presents a sustained argument that PEM actually rules out at least some versions of Embodied and Extended cognition. The aim of this paper is to facilitate a constructive debate between these two competing alternatives by explicating the different theoretical motivations underlying them, and by homing in on the relevant issues that may help to adjudicate between them.(C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 63
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条