A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Subvisible and Visible Particles

被引:104
|
作者
Narhi, Linda O. [1 ]
Jiang, Yijia [1 ]
Cao, Shawn [1 ]
Benedek, Kalman [3 ]
Shnek, Deborah [2 ]
机构
[1] Amgen Inc, Formulat & Analyt Sci, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Drug Prod & Delivery Dev, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[3] iGORi Inc, Newbury Pk, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Subvisible particles; visible particles; light obscuration; flow imaging; particle identification; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.2174/138920109788488905
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The subvisible and visible particles present in a solution are often classified based on size, and are quantified by the actual number of particles present rather than by weight or molar amounts. The analysis of these particles in protein therapeutics are governed by compendial methods and the regulatory agencies, and the methods available to measure them originally evolved focusing on potential safety issues, including capillary occlusion and immunogenicity, that might arise from their presence. Ultracentrifugation, size exclusion chromatography, etc., discussed in previous articles, can be used to analyze aggregates of less than 0.10 microns. This article will focus on methods for analyzing and quantitating sub visible particles (SbVP) of 2 microns or larger. At the present time there is no routine method for quantitating sub visible particles (SbVP) between 0.1 microns and 2 microns. The most common technique for quantitating the amount of subvisible particles between 2 and 100 microns is the light obscuration method. This technique can determine size and amount of particles, but cannot differentiate between the types of particles, such as protein particles, foreign material, micro bubbles or silicone oil droplets, that can be present in protein solutions. The difficulties in adapting this method, originally developed for small molecule drugs for IV administration, to protein therapeutics delivered subcutaneously is discussed. The flow imaging techniques can determine morphology and optical characteristics of the particles, but still not identify the chemical composition. Other methods that can also be used, but are applicable for characterization purposes only, are discussed. The primary method for quantitating visible particles is visual inspection, a method that can be subjective and relies on adequate training of the human inspectors. Automated methods for visible particle determination are being developed. Identification of the chemical composition of isolated particles greater than about 50 microns is possible using several micro-spectroscopic methods, and these will also be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 381
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visible and subvisible particles in the BCG immunotherapeutic product ImmuCyst®
    Kirkitadze, Marina
    Remi, Elena
    Bhandal, Kamaljit
    Carpick, Bruce
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 14 : 154 - 160
  • [2] A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Quantification of Cefotaxime
    Consortti, Livia Paganini
    Nunes Salgado, Herida Regina
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 47 (04) : 359 - 371
  • [3] Critical review on analytical methods for biodiesel characterization
    Monteiro, Marcos Roberto
    Pepe Ambrozin, Alessandra Regina
    Liao, Luciano Morais
    Ferreira, Antonio Gilberto
    TALANTA, 2008, 77 (02) : 593 - 605
  • [4] Phase-Appropriate Application of Analytical Methods to Monitor Subvisible Particles Across the Biotherapeutic Drug Product Life Cycle
    Roman Mathaes
    Linda Narhi
    Andrea Hawe
    Anja Matter
    Karoline Bechtold-Peters
    Sophia Kenrick
    Sambit Kar
    Olga Laskina
    John Carpenter
    Richard Cavicchi
    Ellen Koepf
    E. Neil Lewis
    Rukman De Silva
    Dean Ripple
    The AAPS Journal, 22
  • [5] Phase-Appropriate Application of Analytical Methods to Monitor Subvisible Particles Across the Biotherapeutic Drug Product Life Cycle
    Mathaes, Roman
    Narhi, Linda
    Hawe, Andrea
    Matter, Anja
    Bechtold-Peters, Karoline
    Kenrick, Sophia
    Kar, Sambit
    Laskina, Olga
    Carpenter, John
    Cavicchi, Richard
    Koepf, Ellen
    Lewis, E. Neil
    De Silva, Rukman
    Ripple, Dean
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2020, 22 (01):
  • [6] A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Determination of Ertapenem Sodium
    Pedroso, Tahisa Marcela
    Nunes Salgado, Herida Regina
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 46 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [7] Biological Properties and Analytical Methods for Micafungin: A Critical Review
    Marena, Gabriel Davi
    dos Santos Ramos, Matheus Aparecido
    Bauab, Tais Maria
    Chorilli, Marlus
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 51 (04) : 312 - 328
  • [8] A critical review of analytical methods for determination of curcuminoids in turmeric
    Kotra, Venkata Subba Rao
    Satyabanta, Laishram
    Goswami, Tridib Kumar
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 2019, 56 (12): : 5153 - 5166
  • [9] A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Determination of Ceftriaxone Sodium
    da Trindade, Mariana Teixeira
    Nunes Salgado, Herida Regina
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 48 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [10] A critical review of analytical methods for determination of curcuminoids in turmeric
    Venkata Subba Rao Kotra
    Laishram Satyabanta
    Tridib Kumar Goswami
    Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2019, 56 : 5153 - 5166