Risk of sustained SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Queensland, Australia

被引:5
|
作者
Sanz-Leon, Paula [1 ]
Stevenson, Nathan J. [1 ]
Stuart, Robyn M. [2 ]
Abeysuriya, Romesh G. [3 ]
Pang, James C. [1 ]
Lambert, Stephen B. [4 ]
Kerr, Cliff C. [5 ]
Roberts, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, Brain Modelling Grp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Math Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Burnet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Natl Ctr Immunisat Res & Surveillance Vaccine Pre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Bill & Melinda Gates Fdn, Inst Dis Modeling, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-10349-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We used an agent-based model Covasim to assess the risk of sustained community transmission of SARSCoV-2/COVID-19 in Queensland (Australia) in the presence of high-transmission variants of the virus. The model was calibrated using the demographics, policies, and interventions implemented in the state. Then, using the calibrated model, we simulated possible epidemic trajectories that could eventuate due to leakage of infected cases with high-transmission variants, during a period without recorded cases of locally acquired infections, known in Australian settings as "zero community transmission". We also examined how the threat of new variants reduces given a range of vaccination levels. Specifically, the model calibration covered the first-wave period from early March 2020 to May 2020. Predicted epidemic trajectories were simulated from early February 2021 to late March 2021. Our simulations showed that one infected agent with the ancestral (A.2.2) variant has a 14% chance of crossing a threshold of sustained community transmission (SCT) (i.e., > 5 infections per day, more than 3 days in a row), assuming no change in the prevailing preventative and counteracting policies. However, one agent carrying the alpha (B.1.1.7) variant has a 43% chance of crossing the same threshold; a threefold increase with respect to the ancestral strain; while, one agent carrying the delta (B.1.617.2) variant has a 60% chance of the same threshold, a fourfold increase with respect to the ancestral strain. The delta variant is 50% more likely to trigger SCT than the alpha variant. Doubling the average number of daily tests from similar to 6,000 to 12,000 results in a decrease of this SCT probability from 43 to 33% for the alpha variant. However, if the delta variant is circulating we would need an average of 100,000 daily tests to achieve a similar decrease in SCT risk. Further, achieving a full-vaccination coverage of 70% of the adult population, with a vaccine with 70% effectiveness against infection, would decrease the probability of SCT from a single seed of alpha from 43 to 20%, on par with the ancestral strain in a naive population. In contrast, for the same vaccine coverage and same effectiveness, the probability of SCT from a single seed of delta would decrease from 62 to 48%, a risk slightly above the alpha variant in a naive population. Our results demonstrate that the introduction of even a small number of people infected with high-transmission variants dramatically increases the probability of sustained community transmission in Queensland. Until very high vaccine coverage is achieved, a swift implementation of policies and interventions, together with high quarantine adherence rates, will be required to minimise the probability of sustained community transmission.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk of sustained SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Queensland, Australia
    Paula Sanz-Leon
    Nathan J. Stevenson
    Robyn M. Stuart
    Romesh G. Abeysuriya
    James C. Pang
    Stephen B. Lambert
    Cliff C. Kerr
    James A. Roberts
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] Australia must act to prevent airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Overlooking the potential for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 leaves Australia vulnerable to outbreaks
    Hyde, Zoe
    Berger, David
    Miller, Andrew
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021, 215 (01) : 7 - +
  • [3] SARS-CoV-2: What is the vertical Transmission Risk?
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (11) : 1072 - +
  • [4] Review of the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission
    Xia Li
    Wei-Yi Xia
    Fang Jiang
    Dan-Yong Liu
    Shao-Qing Lei
    Zheng-Yuan Xia
    Qing-Ping Wu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, 9 (07) : 1499 - 1512
  • [5] Review of the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission
    Li, Xia
    Xia, Wei-Yi
    Jiang, Fang
    Liu, Dan-Yong
    Lei, Shao-Qing
    Xia, Zheng-Yuan
    Wu, Qing-Ping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (07) : 1499 - 1512
  • [6] Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
    Bikbov, Boris
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (07) : 1036 - 1037
  • [7] Simulating Transmission Scenarios of the Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia
    Chang, Sheryl L.
    Cliff, Oliver M.
    Zachreson, Cameron
    Prokopenko, Mikhail
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [8] Risk of human-to-wildlife transmission of SARS-CoV-2
    Gryseels, Sophie
    De Bruyn, Luc
    Gyselings, Ralf
    Calvignac-Spencer, Sebastien
    Leendertz, Fabian H.
    Leirs, Herwig
    MAMMAL REVIEW, 2021, 51 (02) : 272 - 292
  • [9] SARS-CoV-2 screening: effectiveness and risk of increasing transmission
    Skittrall, Jordan P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2021, 18 (180)
  • [10] Quantifying transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 in different situations
    Greenhalgh, T.
    Peng, Zhe
    Jimenez, Jose L.
    Bahnfleth, W.
    Dancer, S. J.
    Bourouiba, L.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 376