Introducing NARCliM1.5: Evaluation and projection of climate extremes for southeast Australia

被引:8
|
作者
Ji, Fei [1 ,3 ]
Nishant, Nidhi [2 ,3 ]
Evans, Jason P. [2 ,3 ]
Di Virgilio, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cheung, Kevin K. W. [4 ]
Tam, Eugene [1 ]
Beyer, Kathleen [1 ,5 ]
Riley, Matthew L. [1 ]
机构
[1] NSW Dept Planning & Environm, Sci Econ & Insights Div, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Climate Change Res Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Australian Res Council Ctr Excellence Climate Extr, Sydney, Australia
[4] E3 Complex Consulting, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ Tasmania, Sch Geog Planning & Spatial Sci, Hobart, Australia
来源
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Climate extreme; ET; -SCI; NARCliM; Evaluation; Future projections; WEATHER RESEARCH; SURFACE SCHEMES; BIAS CORRECTION; LAND-SURFACE; MODEL; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; RAINFALL; SIMULATIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wace.2022.100526
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
NARCliM1.5 is the second generation of New South Wales and Australian Regional Climate Modelling (NARCliM) project, which is designed to produce an ensemble of regional climate projections for CORDEX Australasia and southeast Australia. The selected global climate models (GCMs) are used to drive Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for dynamical downscaling. In this study, we evaluate how well the two generations of NARCliM (N1.0 and N1.5) represent the observed record for 12 selected climate extremes and examine their projected changes for southeast Australia. N1.5 ensemble substantially improves upon N1.0 in capturing the spatial patterns of precipitation extremes, however, there is little difference between the two ensembles for temperature extremes. Both N1.0 and N1.5 underestimate dry extreme (consecutive dry day - CDD), hot extremes (warmest daily maximum temperature - TXx, and number of days when maximum temperature is greater than 35 degrees C - TXge35) and daily temperature range (DTR) but overestimate wet extremes (annual sum of daily precipitation above 99th percentile - R99p, consecutive wet days - CWD, days when precipitation is at least 10 mm R10mm, maximum 1-day precipitation - Rx1Day and total wet day precipitation -PRCPTOT) and cold extreme (coldest daily minimum temperature - TNn). N1.0 and N1.5 project different spatial patterns of future changes in precipitation extremes but similar changes in temperature extremes. Differences in climate extremes between N1.0 and N1.5 could be attributed to the driving GCMs. The combined future projections of both N1.0 and N1.5 provide a more complete sampling of the future change space. Future projections indicate that precipitation and temperature extremes will become more intense, raising implications for future planning and risk management.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Introducing NARCliM1.5: Evaluating the Performance of Regional Climate Projections for Southeast Australia for 1950-2100
    Nishant, Nidhi
    Evans, Jason P.
    Di Virgilio, Giovanni
    Downes, Stephanie M.
    Ji, Fei
    Cheung, Kevin K. W.
    Tam, Eugene
    Miller, Joseph
    Beyer, Kathleen
    Riley, Matthew L.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [2] NARCliM1.5 projections over the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia
    Devanand, A.
    Leonard, M.
    Westra, S.
    Nguyen, D.C.H.
    Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, MODSIM, 2023, : 191 - 197
  • [3] Evaluation of Convective Environments in the NARCliM Regional Climate Modeling System for Australia
    Cheung, Kevin K. W.
    Ji, Fei
    Nishant, Nidhi
    Herold, Nicholas
    Cook, Kellie
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (04)
  • [4] Projected changes in the frequency of climate extremes over southeast Australia
    Herold, N.
    Downes, S. M.
    Gross, M. H.
    Ji, F.
    Nishant, N.
    Macadam, I
    Ridder, N. N.
    Beyer, K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 3 (01):
  • [5] Evaluation of the regional climate response in Australia to large-scale climate modes in the historical NARCliM simulations
    Fita, L.
    Evans, J. P.
    Argueso, D.
    King, A.
    Liu, Y.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2017, 49 (7-8) : 2815 - 2829
  • [6] Evaluation of the regional climate response in Australia to large-scale climate modes in the historical NARCliM simulations
    L. Fita
    J. P. Evans
    D. Argüeso
    A. King
    Y. Liu
    Climate Dynamics, 2017, 49 : 2815 - 2829
  • [7] Ensemble evaluation and projection of climate extremes in China using RMIP models
    Niu, Xiaorui
    Wang, Shuyu
    Tang, Jianping
    Lee, Dong-Kyou
    Gutowski, William
    Dairaku, Koji
    McGregor, John
    Katzfey, Jack
    Gao, Xuejie
    Wu, Jia
    Hong, Song-you
    Wang, Yuqing
    Sasaki, Hidetaka
    Fu, Congbin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2018, 38 (04) : 2039 - 2055
  • [8] A modelling approach for estimating the frequency of sea level extremes and the impact of climate change in southeast Australia
    K. L. McInnes
    I. Macadam
    G. D. Hubbert
    J. G. O’Grady
    Natural Hazards, 2009, 51 : 115 - 137
  • [9] A modelling approach for estimating the frequency of sea level extremes and the impact of climate change in southeast Australia
    McInnes, K. L.
    Macadam, I.
    Hubbert, G. D.
    O'Grady, J. G.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 51 (01) : 115 - 137
  • [10] Evaluation of statistical downscaling techniques and projection of climate extremes in central Texas, USA
    Tefera, Gebrekidan Worku
    Ray, Ram L.
    Wootten, Adrienne M.
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2024, 43