Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II study

被引:164
|
作者
Skaane, P [1 ]
Skjennald, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
关键词
breast neoplasms; radiography; breast radiography; comparative studies; cancer screening; digital;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2321031624
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare cancer detection rates, recall rates, and positive predictive values at screen-film mammography (SFM) with those at full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading in a population-based screening program in Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 43,429 women invited, 25,263 women aged 45-69 years attended the screening program and were randomized with adjustments for age and area of residence, to undergo SFM or FFDM. Two standard views of each breast were acquired. Independent double reading was performed with use of a five-point rating scale for probability of cancer. Recall rates, positive predictive values, and cancer detection rates were compared for two age groups (45-49 and 50-69 years) by using the chi(2) test. RESULTS: Overall, 73 cancers. in 17,911 women were detected at SFM (detection rate, 0.41%), compared with 41 cancers in 6,997 women at FFDM (detection rate, 0.59%; P = .06). In the group aged 50-69 years, 56 cancers in 10, 304 women wore detected at SFM (detection rate, 0.54%), compared with 33 cancers in 3,985, at FFDM (detection rate, 0.83%); the difference in cancer detection rates, approached significance (P = .053). In the group aged 45-49 years, 17 cancers in 7,60 Women, were detected at SFM (detection rate, 0.22%), compared with eight cancers in 3,012 at FFDM (detection rate, 0.27%). Recall rates in both age groups were significantly higher at FFDM than at SFM (P < .05), but positive predictive value was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: FFDM allowed a higher cancer detection rate than did SFM in the group aged 50-69, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The detection rate Was nearly equal for the two modalities in the group aged 45-49. SFM and FFDM with soft-copy reading are comparable techniques for population-based screening mammography programs. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study
    Skaane, P
    Young, K
    Skjennald, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) : 877 - 884
  • [2] Comparison of screen-film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading in a population-based screening program: The Oslo II-study
    Skaane, P
    Young, K
    Skjennald, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 267 - 267
  • [3] Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography using soft-copy reading
    Skaane, A
    Young, K
    Egge, ES
    Scheel, B
    Sovik, E
    Skjennald, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 284
  • [4] Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: Follow-up and final results of Oslo II study
    Skaane, Per
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Skjennald, Arnulf
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) : 708 - 717
  • [5] Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Skaane, Per
    Diekmann, Felix
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Diekmann, Susanne
    Piguet, Jean-Charles
    Young, Kari
    Abdelnoor, Michael
    Niklason, Loren
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) : 1134 - 1143
  • [6] Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Per Skaane
    Felix Diekmann
    Corinne Balleyguier
    Susanne Diekmann
    Jean-Charles Piguet
    Kari Young
    Michael Abdelnoor
    Loren Niklason
    [J]. European Radiology, 2008, 18
  • [7] Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: Comparison in the patients with microcalcifications
    Kim, HS
    Han, BK
    Choo, KS
    Jeon, YH
    Kim, JH
    Choe, YH
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 214 - 220
  • [8] Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study
    Juel, Inger-Marie
    Skaane, Per
    Hoff, Solveig Roth
    Johannessen, Gunnar
    Hofvind, Solveig
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (09) : 962 - 968
  • [9] Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Skaane, P
    Skjennald, A
    Young, K
    Egge, E
    Jebsen, I
    Sager, EM
    Scheel, B
    Sovik, E
    Ertzaas, AK
    Hofvind, S
    Abdelnoor, M
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (07) : 679 - 689
  • [10] Comparison of interpretation times for screening exams between soft copy full-field digital mammography and hard copy screen-film mammography
    Solari, M
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Wolfman, JA
    Willis, W
    Segal, L
    DeLeon, P
    Benjamin, S
    Reddy, D
    Mendelson, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 11 - 11