Copper leaching from primary sulfides: Options for biological and chemical extraction of copper

被引:185
|
作者
Dreisinger, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Mat Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
chemical and biological leaching; autoclave; copper; acid;
D O I
10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.03.032
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The primary sulfide minerals of copper have been difficult to leach for the purpose of direct copper extraction. In particular, chalcopyrite has been observed to undergo a type of "passivation" under a variety of oxidative leaching conditions. Over the last 10-15 years, a variety of biological and chemical leaching processes have emerged for overcoming the passivation of chalcopyrite. A number of these processes are now entering commercial production or are approaching this status. The BIOCOP(TM) process of BHP Billiton has now been commercialized at the Alliance Copper plant in Chile. The Total Pressure Oxidation technology has been implemented by Phelps Dodge at Bagdad, Arizona. The Mt. Gordon copper process and the Sepon copper process both use autoclave processes in the overall metallurgical circuit. In the Mt. Gordon circuit, the autoclave was used to leach copper while at Sepon the autoclave is used to produce acid and ferric sulfate to meet the requirements of an atmospheric leach. CESL and CVRD have completed a feasibility study to apply the CESL copper process in Brazil. PLATSOL(TM) technology for copper, nickel, cobalt and precious metal recovery is now under final feasibility study for application by PolyMet Mining at the NorthMet deposit in Minnesota, USA. The number of available options for copper recovery from primary sulfides is multiplying. In addition to the above options utilizing stirred reactor leaching, a number of heap leach options for primary sulfides are also emerging. For this paper, the various processes for copper extraction from concentrate were reviewed, including the underlying mechanisms of leaching, followed by a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of selected process options. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 20
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chemical and biological sensing with nanocomposites prepared from nanostructured copper sulfides
    Huynh, Tan-Phat
    NANO FUTURES, 2020, 4 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [2] ON THE EXTRACTION OF COPPER AND ZINC FROM COPPER SCHIST BY FLOTATION AND LEACHING
    HAMMAMI, R
    CLEMENT, M
    METALL, 1980, 34 (11): : 989 - 995
  • [3] Solar thermal extraction of copper from sulfides
    Winkel, L
    Guesdon, C
    Sturzenegger, M
    METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS PROCESSING: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1: MATERIALS PROCESSING FUNDAMENTALS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2003, : 603 - 612
  • [4] PRIMARY COPPER SULFIDES FROM THE KUPFERSCHIEFER, POLAND
    SAWLOWICZ, Z
    MINERALIUM DEPOSITA, 1990, 25 (04) : 262 - 271
  • [5] Primary copper sulfides bioleaching vs. chloride leaching: Advantages and drawbacks
    Bobadilla-Fazzini, Roberto A.
    Perez, Agustin
    Gautier, Veronica
    Jordan, Hector
    Parada, Pilar
    HYDROMETALLURGY, 2017, 168 : 26 - 31
  • [6] Influence of Surfactant Adsorption on the Leaching of Copper Sulfides
    Nowak, Pawel
    ELECTROCHEMISTRY IN MINERAL AND METAL PROCESSING 8 (EMMP 8), 2010, 28 (06): : 143 - 153
  • [7] SIGNIFICANCE OF GALVANIC CORROSION IN LEACHING OF COPPER SULFIDES
    APPS, JA
    JOURNAL OF METALS, 1969, 21 (12): : A25 - &
  • [8] EXTRACTION OF COPPER(II) AND COPPER(I) CHLORIDES BY ORGANIC SULFIDES
    CHEKUSHIN, VS
    BALYUTA, IG
    KOKORIN, VS
    ZHURNAL NEORGANICHESKOI KHIMII, 1982, 27 (04): : 998 - 1000
  • [9] Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biological and Chemical Leaching of Copper, Nickel and Zinc from Circuit Boards
    Andrzejewska-Gorecka, Dorota Anna
    Poniatowska, Agnieszka
    Macherzynski, Bartlomiej
    Wojewodkal, Dominik
    Wszelaka-Rylik, Malgorzata Edyta
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 20 (09): : 62 - 69
  • [10] BACTERIAL LEACHING - COMPLEX SULFIDES OF COPPER, LEAD AND ZINC
    CHAUDHURY, GR
    DAS, RP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 1987, 21 (1-2) : 57 - 64