Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology

被引:176
|
作者
Dale, MRT [1 ]
Fortin, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biol Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Zool, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada
来源
ECOSCIENCE | 2002年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
effective sample size; Monte Carlo methods; restricted randomization; subsampling;
D O I
10.1080/11956860.2002.11682702
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The presence of positive spatial autocorrelation in ecological data causes parametric statistical tests to give more apparently significant results than the data justify. which is a serious problem tor both statistical and ecological interpretation. In this paper, we review this problem and sonic of the statistical approaches that have been used to address it. concentrating on statistical methods rather than on sampling or experimental design. We then describe in more detail the technique Of adjusting, the "effective sample size" based on the autocorrelation structure of the data. Unfortunately, the effective sample size cannot be reliably estimated from the data. and therefore this approach may not be a general solution to the problem. An alternative approach is to determine a parametric model of the data and its spatial autocorrelation structure. and then to use a Monte Carlo approach to generate the distribution of the test statistic of interest using that model. We suggest that this latter approach should be used in situations in which no robust analytically derived solution is available.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial Autocorrelation and Statistical Tests: Some Solutions
    Dale, Mark R. T.
    Fortin, Marie-Josee
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2009, 14 (02) : 188 - 206
  • [2] Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests: Some solutions
    Mark R. T. Dale
    Marie-Josée Fortin
    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2009, 14 : 188 - 206
  • [3] Spatial autocorrelation and pseudoreplication in fire ecology
    Amanda L. Bataineh
    Brian P. Oswald
    Mohammad Bataineh
    Daniel Unger
    I-Kuai Hung
    Daniel Scognamillo
    Fire Ecology, 2006, 2 (2) : 107 - 118
  • [4] Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology
    Lichstein, JW
    Simons, TR
    Shriner, SA
    Franzreb, KE
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2002, 72 (03) : 445 - 463
  • [5] Quantifying kinematic substructure in star-forming regions with statistical tests of spatial autocorrelation
    Arnold, Becky
    Wright, Nicholas J.
    Parker, Richard J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 515 (02) : 2266 - 2279
  • [6] Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology
    Diniz, JAF
    Bini, LM
    Hawkins, BA
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (01): : 53 - 64
  • [7] Spatial autocorrelation: an overlooked concept in behavioral ecology
    Valcu, Mihai
    Kempenaers, Bart
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) : 902 - 905
  • [8] Assessment of spatial autocorrelation in empirical models in ecology
    Cablk, M
    White, D
    Kiester, AR
    PREDICTING SPECIES OCCURRENCES: ISSUES OF ACCURACY AND SCALE, 2002, : 429 - 440
  • [9] Predicting the magnitude of residual spatial autocorrelation in geographical ecology
    Kim, Daehyun
    ECOGRAPHY, 2021, 44 (07) : 1121 - 1130
  • [10] Spatial autocorrelation analysis in geomorphology:: Definitions and tests.
    Aubry, P
    Piégay, H
    GEOGRAPHIE PHYSIQUE ET QUATERNAIRE, 2001, 55 (02): : 111 - 129