Cervical Conization and Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Treatment of Stage I Cervical Cancer Is Less Enough?

被引:42
|
作者
Andikyan, Vaagn [1 ]
Khoury-Collado, Fady [1 ]
Denesopolis, John [1 ]
Park, Kay J. [2 ]
Hussein, Yaser R. [2 ]
Brown, Carol L. [1 ,3 ]
Sonoda, Yukio [1 ,3 ]
Chi, Dennis S. [1 ,3 ]
Barakat, Richard R. [1 ,3 ]
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Gynecol Serv, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Stage I cervical cancer; Conization; Sentinel lymph node mapping; RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY; HYSTERECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to determine the feasibility of cervical conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping as a fertility-sparing strategy to treat stage I cervical cancer and to estimate the tumor margin status needed to achieve no residual carcinoma in the cervix. Methods We identified all patients who desired fertility preservation and underwent SLN mapping with cervical conization for stage I cervical cancer from September 2005 to August 2012. Relevant demographic, clinical, and pathologic information was collected. Results Ten patients were identified. Median age was 28 years (range, 18-36 years). None of the patients had a grossly visible tumor. The initial diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was made either on a loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cone biopsy. All patients underwent preoperative radiologic evaluation (magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography). None of the patients had evidence of gross tumor or suspicion of lymph node metastasis on imaging. Stage distribution included 7 (70%) patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer with lymphovascular invasion and 3 (30%) patients with microscopic IB1. Histologic diagnosis included 8 (80%) patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 1 (10%) patient with adenocarcinoma, and 1 (10%) patient with clear cell carcinoma. Nine patients underwent repeat cervical conization with SLN mapping, and 1 patient underwent postconization cervical biopsies and SLN mapping. None of the patients had residual tumor identified on the final specimen. The median distance from the invasive carcinoma to the endocervical margin was 2.25 mm, and the distance from the invasive carcinoma to the ectocervical margin was 1.9 mm. All collected lymph nodes were negative for metastasis. After a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 1-83 months), none of the patients' conditions were diagnosed with recurrent disease and 3 (30%) patients achieved pregnancy. Conclusions Cervical conization and SLN mapping seems to be an acceptable treatment strategy for selected patients with small-volume stage I cervical cancer. Tumor clearance of 2 mm and above seems to correlate well with no residual on repeat conization. A larger sample size and longer follow-up is needed to establish the long-term outcomes of this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 117
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CERVICAL CONIZATION AND SENTINEL LYMPH NODE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN EARLY LOW-RISK CERVICAL CANCER. LESS IS BETTER?
    Esteban, A.
    Lucchini, S.
    Ferreyra, H.
    Goldsman, M. G.
    Fochini, M.
    Heredia, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 : A171 - A172
  • [2] Sentinel lymph node mapping in cervical cancer: the future?
    Eiriksson, L. R.
    Covens, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [3] Cervical conization and lymph node assessment for early stage low-risk cervical cancer
    Nica, Andra
    Marchocki, Zbigniew
    Gien, Lilian T.
    Kupets, Rachel
    Vicus, Danielle
    Covens, Allan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (03) : 447 - 451
  • [4] Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer
    Cormier, Beatrice
    Diaz, John P.
    Shih, Karin
    Sampson, Rachael M.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Park, Kay J.
    Alektiar, Khaled
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 122 (02) : 275 - 280
  • [5] Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial and cervical cancer in Denmark
    Bjornholt, Sarah Marie
    Sponholtz, Sara Elizabeth
    Markauskas, Algirdas
    Froding, Ligita Paskeviciute
    Larsen, Christian Rifbjerg
    Fuglsang, Katrine
    Schledermann, Doris
    Mogensen, Ole
    Jensen, Pernille Tine
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 68 (04):
  • [6] Sentinel lymph node mapping in early stage of endometrial and cervical cancers
    Allameh, Tajossadat
    Hashemi, Vahidehsadat
    Mohammadizadeh, Fereshteh
    Behnamfar, Fariba
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 20 (02): : 169 - 173
  • [7] Conization and lymph node evaluation as a fertility-sparing treatment for early stage cervical cancer
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Ditto, Antonino
    Filippi, Francesca
    Vinti, Daniele
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Leone Roberti Maggiore, Umberto
    Evangelista, Mariateresa
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (03) : 457 - 461
  • [8] Sentinel lymph node and cervical cancer
    Elghissassi, Ibrahim
    M'rabti, Hind
    Bensouda, Youssef
    Rahhali, Rabie
    Benjelloun, Samir
    Hassan, Errihani
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2008, 18 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [9] Establishing an optimal sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer
    Cormier, B.
    Diaz, J.
    Shih, K.
    Sampson, R.
    Sonoda, Y.
    Park, K.
    Chi, D.
    Barakat, R.
    Alektiar, K.
    Abu-Rustum, N.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S19 - S19
  • [10] DETECTION OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN CERVICAL CANCER USING THE SENTINEL NODE MAPPING
    Baiocchi, G.
    Mantoan, H.
    Kumagai, L.
    Badiglian-Filho, L.
    Faloppa, C.
    De Brot, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 696 - 696