Epicardial fat volume measured on nongated chest CT is a predictor of coronary artery disease

被引:34
|
作者
Nagayama, Yasunori [1 ]
Nakamura, Naoki [2 ]
Itatani, Ryo [2 ]
Oda, Seitaro [1 ]
Kusunoki, Shinichiro [2 ]
Takahashi, Hideo [2 ]
Nakaura, Takeshi [1 ]
Utsunomiya, Daisuke [3 ]
Yamashita, Yasuyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Chuo Ku, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Minamata City Gen Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1-2-1 Tenjin Cho, Minamata 8670041, Japan
[3] Yokohama City Univ Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kanazawa Ku, 3-9 Fukuura, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360004, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Multidetector computed tomography; Pericardium; Body fat distribution; Coronary artery disease; Predictive value of tests; CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ADIPOSE-TISSUE VOLUME; INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR; LIVER FAT; CALCIUM; QUANTIFICATION; ASSOCIATION; AGREEMENT; SCANS; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-019-06079-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo investigate whether epicardial fat volume (EFV) quantified on ECG-nongated noncontrast CT (nongated-NCCT) could be used as a reliable and reproducible predictor for coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsOne hundred seventeen subjects (65 men, mean age 66.611.9years) underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and nongated-NCCT during a single session because of symptoms suggestive of CAD. Two observers independently quantified EFV on both images. Correlation between CCTA-EFV and nongated-NCCT-EFV was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. Inter-observer agreement was analyzed using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Coronary risk factors including EFV were compared between CAD-positive (>50% stenosis) and CAD-negative groups. The association between EFV and CAD was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. ROC analysis was performed, and AUC was compared with DeLong's method.ResultsSeventy-four subjects were diagnosed with CAD. An excellent correlation was noted between CCTA-EFV and nongated-NCCT-EFV (r=0.948, p<0.001), despite the systematic difference between both measurements (mean bias, 1.26). Inter-observer agreement was nearly perfect (CCC, 0.988 and 0.985 for CCTA and nongated-NCCT, respectively, p<0.001). Significant differences were noted between subjects with versus without CAD in age, hypertension, and EFV on both types of images (p0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed that increased EFV on CCTA (odds ratio 1.185, p=0.003) and nongated-NCCT (odds ratio 1.20, p=0.015) was independently associated with CAD. There was no significant difference between CCTA-EFV and nongated-NCCT-EFV in AUC for the prediction of CAD (0.659 vs 0.665, p=0.706).ConclusionsDespite the absence of ECG gating, EFV measured on NCCT may serve as a reproducible predictor for CAD with accuracy equivalent to EFV measured on CCTA.Key Points center dot Despite the absence of ECG gating, the EFV on NCCT provides nearly perfect inter-observer reproducibility and shows excellent correlation with measurements on gated CCTA.center dot EFV on nongated-NCCT may serve as an independent biomarker for predicting coronary artery disease with accuracy equivalent to that of EFV on gated CCTA.
引用
收藏
页码:3638 / 3646
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epicardial fat volume measured on nongated chest CT is a predictor of coronary artery disease
    Yasunori Nagayama
    Naoki Nakamura
    Ryo Itatani
    Seitaro Oda
    Shinichiro Kusunoki
    Hideo Takahashi
    Takeshi Nakaura
    Daisuke Utsunomiya
    Yasuyuki Yamashita
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 3638 - 3646
  • [2] Correction to: Epicardial fat volume measured on nongated chest CT is a predictor of coronary artery disease
    Yasunori Nagayama
    Naoki Nakamura
    Ryo Itatani
    Seitaro Oda
    Shinichiro Kusunoki
    Hideo Takahashi
    Takeshi Nakaura
    Daisuke Utsunomiya
    Yasuyuki Yamashita
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 7078 - 7079
  • [3] Epicardial fat volume measured on nongated chest CT is a predictor of coronary artery disease (vol 29, pg 3638, 2019)
    Nagayama, Yasunori
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Itatani, Ryo
    Oda, Seitaro
    Kusunoki, Shinichiro
    Takahashi, Hideo
    Nakaura, Takeshi
    Utsunomiya, Daisuke
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 7078 - 7079
  • [4] Epicardial Fat Volume as a Good Predictor for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    EL Shahawy, Eman S.
    Hassan, Asmaa A.
    EL Shahawy, Mohamed S.
    HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE & CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION, 2023, 30 (05) : 427 - 434
  • [5] Epicardial Fat Volume as a Good Predictor for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Eman S. EL Shahawy
    Asmaa A. Hassan
    Mohamed S. EL Shahawy
    High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 2023, 30 : 427 - 434
  • [6] Association of Epicardial Fat Volume with Coronary Artery Ectasia and Coronary Artery Disease
    Subhan, Shoaib
    Sami, Abdul
    Akhtar, Waheed
    Jan, Muneeb Ullah
    Ullah, Asif
    Malik, Jahanzeb
    ANGIOLOGY, 2023, 74 (06) : 563 - 568
  • [7] EPICARDIAL FAT VOLUME IN WOMEN WITH CHEST PAIN AND NO OBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE - THE IPOWER STUDY
    Shahriari, Persia
    Frestad, D.
    Michelsen, M. M.
    Mygind, N. D.
    Pena, A.
    Hove, J. D.
    Gustafsson, I.
    Prescott, E.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2017, 263 : E72 - E73
  • [8] Coronary artery disease is accompanied by increased epicardial fat volume
    Gui, DanTing
    Huang, WeiLu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 323 : 21 - 21
  • [9] Relationship between epicardial fat volume and complexity of coronary artery disease
    Zaghloul, Ayman Ashraf Saad
    Radwan, Mohamed Helmy
    Zeidan, Hanan Hafez
    Hassan, Housam Magdy
    Elsayed, Amr Adel
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2020, 22 (0A) : A7 - A7
  • [10] Relationship between epicardial fat volume measured by multi-detector computed tomography and coronary artery disease
    Taha, Doaa Ashour
    El Shafey, Rasha Ahmed Ali
    Hamesa, Manal Fathy
    Abu-Dewan, Khaled Abd El-Wahab
    Nagy, Hanan Ahmad
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01):