Pain Scores and Exposure Rates after Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

被引:7
|
作者
Illston, Jana D.
Garris, Jeffrey B.
Richter, Holly E.
Wheeler, Thomas L., II
机构
[1] Greenville Hlth Syst, Greenville, SC USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Sch Med Greenville, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Greenville, SC USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
mesh exposure; pain; pelvic organ prolapse; vaginal mesh; NATIVE TISSUE-REPAIR; TROCAR-GUIDED MESH; TRANSVAGINAL MESH; VAGINAL MESH; ANTERIOR COLPORRHAPHY; RECURRENT PROLAPSE; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000377
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To characterize pain and exposure after Prolift placement and identify risk factors. Methods A case series of women who underwent Prolift vaginal mesh were surveyed. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Exposure was evaluated clinically. Results Of 183 eligible patients, 160 completed the survey, and 45 returned for examination. Mean preoperative pain score was 0.97 and postoperative was 1.35 (P = 0.12). Pre- and postoperative pain scores by compartment were: anterior (1.34 vs 1.25, mean change -0.09, P = 0.84), posterior (1.30 vs 1.56, mean change 0.26, P = 0.72), and total (0.63 vs 1.34, mean change 0.71, P = 0.05). Graft exposure was confirmed in 23 of 183 patients (12.6%); however, because asymptomatic patients were not examined, the true exposure rate may be underestimated. Hematoma formation is independently associated with mesh exposure, adjusted odds ratio 18.4 (95% confidence interval 3.4-147.4, P = 0.01). Conclusions Although pain scores did not increase overall, there was a trend toward increased pain score in the patients with total (anterior and posterior) Prolift. Hematoma formation was significantly associated with mesh exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 721
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Haya, Nir
    Maher, Christopher
    [J]. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (03): : 129 - 138
  • [3] Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Nir Haya
    Christopher Maher
    [J]. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (3) : 129 - 138
  • [4] Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse
    Karen P. Gold
    Renee M. Ward
    Carl W. Zimmerman
    Daniel H. Biller
    Shawn McGuinn
    James C. Slaughter
    Roger R. Dmochowski
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 1461 - 1466
  • [5] Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse
    Gold, Karen P.
    Ward, Renee M.
    Zimmerman, Carl W.
    Biller, Daniel H.
    McGuinn, Shawn
    Slaughter, James C.
    Dmochowski, Roger R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (10) : 1461 - 1466
  • [6] Erratum to: Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Nir Haya
    Christopher Maher
    [J]. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (4) : 195 - 195
  • [7] Postoperative pain after transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse with or without mesh
    Niro, J.
    Philippe, A. -C.
    Jaffeux, P.
    Amblard, J.
    Velemir, L.
    Savary, D.
    Jacquetin, B.
    Fatton, B.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2010, 38 (11): : 648 - 652
  • [8] Vaginal repair of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse using polypropylene mesh
    Wagner, John R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04): : 103S - 103S
  • [9] Complications of transvaginal monofilament polypropylene mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair
    Farnaz A. Ganj
    Okechukwu A. Ibeanu
    Ahmet Bedestani
    Thomas E. Nolan
    Ralph R. Chesson
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2009, 20
  • [10] Complications of transvaginal monofilament polypropylene mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair
    Ganj, Farnaz A.
    Ibeanu, Okechukwu A.
    Bedestani, Ahmet
    Nolan, Thomas E.
    Chesson, Ralph R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (08) : 919 - 925