Standard versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: assessing the impact on dose modulation and normal tissue effects when using patient-specific cancer biology

被引:2
|
作者
Her, E. J. [1 ]
Ebert, M. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, A. [2 ]
Reynolds, H. M. [4 ]
Sun, Y. [5 ]
Williams, S. [4 ,6 ]
Haworth, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Phys Math & Comp, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] 5D Clin, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2021年 / 66卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
prostate cancer; hypofractionation; tumour control probability; IMRT; multiparametric MRI;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab9354
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Hypofractionation of prostate cancer radiotherapy achieves tumour control at lower total radiation doses, however, increased rectal and bladder toxicities have been observed. To realise the radiobiological advantage of hypofractionation whilst minimising harm, the potential reduction in dose to organs at risk was investigated for biofocused radiotherapy. Patient-specific tumour location and cell density information were derived from multiparametric imaging. Uniform-dose plans and biologically-optimised plans were generated for a standard schedule (78 Gy/39 fractions) and hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy/20 fractions and 36.25 Gy/5 fractions). Results showed that biologically-optimised plans yielded statistically lower doses to the rectum and bladder compared to isoeffective uniform-dose plans for all fractionation schedules. A reduction in the number of fractions increased the target dose modulation required to achieve equal tumour control. On average, biologically-optimised, moderately-hypofractionated plans demonstrated 15.3% (p-value: <0.01) and 23.8% (p-value: 0.02) reduction in rectal and bladder dose compared with standard fractionation. The tissue-sparing effect was more pronounced in extreme hypofractionation with mean reduction in rectal and bladder dose of 43.3% (p-value: < 0.01) and 41.8% (p-value: 0.02), respectively. This study suggests that the ability to utilise patient-specific tumour biology information will provide greater incentive to employ hypofractionation in the treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiotherapy. However, to exploit the radiobiological advantages given by hypofractionation, greater attention to geometric accuracy is required due to increased sensitivity to treatment uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Prostate Cancer Using Patient-Specific Cancer Biology
    Her, E.
    Haworth, A.
    Kennedy, A.
    Reynolds, H.
    Sun, Y.
    Bangert, M.
    Williams, S.
    Ebert, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E507 - E507
  • [2] Conventional versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for Prostate cancer
    Pahl, R.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (09) : 841 - 842
  • [3] Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer
    Naismith, O.
    Mayles, H.
    Bidmead, M.
    Clark, C. H.
    Gulliford, S.
    Hassan, S.
    Khoo, V
    Roberts, K.
    South, C.
    Hall, E.
    Dearnaley, D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (09) : 611 - 620
  • [4] Prediction of the benefits from dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Amer, AM
    Mott, J
    Mackay, RI
    Williams, PC
    Livsey, J
    Logue, JP
    Hendry, JH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (01): : 199 - 207
  • [5] Outcome and patient-reported toxicity in localised prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Thomson, David
    Merrick, Sophie
    Swindell, Ric
    Wylie, James
    Cowan, Richard
    Elliott, Tony
    Logue, John
    Livsey, Jacqueline
    Choudhury, Ananya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2013, 12 (04) : 326 - 333
  • [7] Outcomes of dose-escalation using an image-guided, hypofractionated, intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for localized prostate cancer
    Shridhar, R.
    Perry, D. J.
    Bolton, S.
    Joiner, M.
    Forman, J. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S387 - S387
  • [8] Radiation Dose Escalation for Localized Prostate Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Permanent Transperineal Brachytherapy
    Wong, William W.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Andrews, Paul E.
    Ferrigni, Robert G.
    Swanson, Scott K.
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (23) : 5596 - 5606
  • [9] Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial
    Dearnaley, David
    Syndikus, Isabel
    Sumo, Georges
    Bidmead, Margaret
    Bloomfield, David
    Clark, Catharine
    Gao, Annie
    Hassan, Shama
    Horwich, Alan
    Huddart, Robert
    Khoo, Vincent
    Kirkbride, Peter
    Mayles, Helen
    Mayles, Philip
    Naismith, Olivia
    Parker, Chris
    Patterson, Helen
    Russell, Martin
    Scrase, Christopher
    South, Chris
    Staffurth, John
    Hall, Emma
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (01): : 43 - 54
  • [10] Patient reported toxicity and quality of life after hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for intermediate- and high risk prostate cancer
    Houben, Jeroen
    McColl, Gill
    Kaanders, Johannes Ham
    Smeenk, Robert J.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 29 : 40 - 46