Does the Form 20-F reconciliation help ensure the financial reporting quality of cross-listed IFRS firms? A comparison with cross-listed non-IFRS firms

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Yi-Hung [1 ]
Huang, Hua-Wei [2 ]
Dao, Mai [3 ]
Huang, Ting-Chiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Accounting, 20 Chancellors Walk, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Management, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Univ Toledo, Coll Business Adm & Innovat, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
Form 20-F reconciliation; IFRS; industry specialization; legal regime; restatements; AUDITOR INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS; INVESTOR PROTECTION; EARNINGS QUALITY; ACCOUNTING RESTATEMENTS; INTERACTION TERMS; U.S; GAAP; ADOPTION; LEGAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/ijau.12228
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether financial reporting quality improves or deteriorates after the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided to eliminate the Form 20-F reconciliation requirement for foreign cross-listed firms following International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that cross-listed IFRS firms are less likely to restate financial statements after the SEC revoked their reconciliation requirement, as compared to cross-listed non-IFRS firms that still need to prepare the reconciliation. Moreover, such a reduction in the occurrence of financial restatements is more prominent when cross-listed IFRS firms engage global industry-specialist auditors and originate from common law countries. Together, this paper lends support to the elimination of the reconciliation requirement for cross-listed IFRS firms and highlights the important roles of auditors and the legal environment in shaping financial reporting quality.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 474
页数:33
相关论文
共 20 条