Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Biao [1 ]
Li, Haoran [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Zheng, Yanlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
adalimumab; noninfectious uveitis; anti-TNF-alpha; treatment; meta-analysis; INTERMEDIATE; MULTICENTER; POSTERIOR; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2021.673984
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) are at risk of systemic side effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy and uncontrolled inflammatory complications. In urgent need to identify more aggressive therapies, adalimumab (ADA) may be the right choice. Objectives: To summarize the current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of ADA in the treatment of NIU. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and Clinical Trials Registry for qualifying articles from their inception to November 19, 2020, with no language restriction. Randomized controlled trials comparing ADA with conventional routine treatment in noninfectious uveitis patients of any age, gender, or ethnicity were included. The primary outcome was the time to treatment failure (TF). The secondary outcomes were the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in the anterior chamber (AC) cell grade, change in vitreous haze (VH) grade, and adverse events (AEs). Main results: The six studies comprised 605 participants in all, and the sample size of each study ranged from 16 to 225. The overall pooled results of the primary outcome (HR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41 to -0.63) showed that ADA nearly halved the risk of treatment failure compared to placebo for NIU patients. The pooled mean difference of change in BCVA was -0.05 (95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02). The pooled mean difference of change in AC cell grade and VH grade was -0.29 (95% CI, -0.62 to -0.05) and -0.21 (95% CI, -0.32 to -0.11), respectively. The incidence of AEs in the ADA group was numerically higher than that of AEs in the placebo group (2,237 events and 9.40 events per patient-year, equivalent to 1,257 events and 7.79 events per patient-year). Conclusion: This meta-analysis of six RCTs further confirmed that ADA considerably lowered the risk of treatment failure or visual loss, and moderately reduced AC cell grades and VH grades with slightly more AEs, as compared to placebo. ADA is both effective and safe in treating NIU.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in hidradenitis suppurativa A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lu, Jing-Wun
    Huang, Yu-Wen
    Chen, Tai-Li
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (22) : E26190
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zuo, Haihong
    Zhang, Wei
    Yan, Yuqing
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Patients with Behcet Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sener, Hidayet
    Evereklioglu, Cem
    Horozoglu, Fatih
    Sener, Ayse Busra Gunay
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Aboulatta, Laila Nabil Mahmoud Helmy
    Abou-Setta, Ahamed M.
    Aloud, Basma
    Askin, Nicole
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Shouman, Walid
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 329 - 330
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guedeney, Paul
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Sorrentino, Sabato
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Camaj, Anton
    Kalkman, Deborah N.
    Vogel, Birgit
    Sartori, Samantha
    De Rosa, Salvatore
    Baber, Usman
    Indolfi, Ciro
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Dangas, George D.
    Rosenson, Robert S.
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    Mehran, Roxana
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (07) : E17 - E25
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of lorcaserin in obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Singh, Awadhesh Kumar
    Singh, Ritu
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 13 (02) : 183 - 190
  • [7] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF NITAZOXANIDE ON DIARRHEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Hashan, Mohammad
    Elhusseiny, Khaled
    Le, Huu
    Hien Tong Thi Thu
    Thuan Minh Tieu
    Low, Soon
    Thai Le Ba Nghia
    Nhu, Mai
    Eid, Peter
    Nguyen, Phuong
    Loc Quang Le
    Abed, Mohammed
    Le Huu Nhat Minh
    Hirayama, Kenji
    Nguyen Tien Huy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2018, 99 (04): : 369 - 370
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Oncolytic Viruses in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Zengbin
    Jiang, Zeju
    Zhang, Yingxuan
    Huang, Xiaotian
    Liu, Qiong
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [9] The Efficacy and Safety of Telerehabilitation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wu, Yong-Qiang
    Long, Yi
    Peng, Wei-Jie
    Gong, Cheng
    Liu, Yue-Quan
    Peng, Xu-Miao
    Zhong, Yan-Biao
    Luo, Yun
    Wang, Mao -Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of aminoglycoside monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Vidal, Liat
    Gafter-Gvili, Anat
    Borok, Sara
    Fraser, Abigail
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 60 (02) : 247 - 257