Open Subpectoral Tenodesis for Isolated Traumatic Long Head of Biceps Tendon Rupture Provides Excellent Functional Outcomes in Active Male Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Waugh, Christopher A. [1 ]
Havenhand, Tom [2 ]
Jain, Neil [3 ]
机构
[1] Pennine Acute NHS Fdn Trust, Orthopaed, Manchester, England
[2] Pennine Acute NHS Fdn Trust, Orthopaed & Trauma, Manchester, England
[3] Pennine Acute Hosp NHS Trust, Trauma & Orthopaed, Manchester, England
关键词
bicep pain; bicep tendon; tenodesis; biceps tenodesis; long head of biceps tendon; INJURIES;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.31553
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: For many years the long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) rupture has been described and is commonly identified by weakness, cramping, and the so-called "Popeye" sign. Traditionally, this was treated non-operatively, likely reflecting patient factors and the technical difficulty in reattaching a degenerative and shortened tendon. In contrast, traumatic distal biceps rupture is now commonly repaired despite historically being managed non-operatively. The advent of a convenient and reproducible surgical technique led to an increase in the rate of fixation, thereby improving the cramping and weakness associated with non -operative treatment. Given recent surgical advances within this field, many techniques are now present for LHBT pathology. We describe results from a cohort of patients suffering traumatic LHBT rupture who sought a surgical solution to improve their symptoms.Methods: Over four years, 18 male patients underwent surgical intervention for isolated traumatic LHBT rupture. The technique used involved an open subpectoral tenodesis with fixation of the LHBT into the bicipital groove. Postoperative immobilization using a sling was recommended for six weeks prior to a progressive rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed with pre-and postoperative visual analog scores (VAS) for pain and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) scores.Results: The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 49 years (range: 26-65 years). The mean time to surgery was nine weeks (range: 2-24 weeks). All patients showed an improvement following surgery with a mean pre-op ASES score of 33 (range: 10-60) compared to a post-op score of 92.6 (range: 85-100). All patients were able to return to work and sport, with all but one returning to the same functional demand level of work. The mean pre-op pain VAS was 6.3 (out of 10) compared to 0.2 post-op. All patients had a requirement for analgesia pre-operatively and none had postoperatively. No surgical complications were observed. No correlation was observed between the time to surgery and the outcome.Discussion: LHBT rupture is often treated non-operatively as few studies within the literature describe the surgical technique and outcomes from surgical intervention. When treated non-operatively, patients complain of pain, cramping, and cosmetic deformity known as the "Popeye" sign. Following a traumatic rupture of the LHBT, we have demonstrated excellent outcomes using a standard approach and common fixation technique that has the potential to improve the functional outcome for symptomatic patients.Conclusion: Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis is associated with excellent outcomes in symptomatic patients following isolated LHBT rupture.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon for pathologies of the long head of the biceps tendon and the biceps pulley
    Braun, S.
    Minzlaff, P.
    Imhoff, A. B.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2012, 24 (06): : 479 - 485
  • [2] Conversion of Failed Proximal Long Head of the Biceps Tenodesis to Distal Subpectoral Tenodesis: Outcomes in an Active Population
    Peebles, Liam A.
    Midtgaard, Kaare S.
    Aman, Zachary S.
    Douglass, Brenton W.
    Nolte, Philip-Christian
    Millett, Peter J.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (12): : 2975 - 2981
  • [3] Chronic rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon: comparison of 2-year results following primary versus revision open subpectoral biceps tenodesis
    Simon A. Euler
    Marilee P. Horan
    Michael B. Ellman
    Joshua A. Greenspoon
    Peter J. Millett
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016, 136 : 657 - 663
  • [4] Technical note: subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon using a mini-open technique
    Hinz, Maximilian
    Pogorzelski, Jonas
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Siebenlist, Sebastian
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2021, 34 (06) : 467 - 471
  • [5] Chronic rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon: comparison of 2-year results following primary versus revision open subpectoral biceps tenodesis
    Euler, Simon A.
    Horan, Marilee P.
    Ellman, Michael B.
    Greenspoon, Joshua A.
    Millett, Peter J.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (05) : 657 - 663
  • [6] Outcomes following long head of biceps tendon tenodesis
    AlQahtani S.M.
    Bicknell R.T.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2016, 9 (4) : 378 - 387
  • [7] Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Tenotomy versus Subpectoral Tenodesis in Rotator Cuff Repair
    Kim, Jangwoo
    Nam, Ji Hoon
    Kim, Yuna
    Kim, Jong Seop
    Kim, Sae Hoon
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (03) : 371 - 378
  • [8] Long head of the biceps tendon rupture in professional wrestlers: treatment with a mini-open tenodesis
    Tangari, Mario
    Carbone, Stefano
    Gallo, Mimmo
    Campi, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (03) : 409 - 413
  • [9] Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Tenosynovitis of the Long Head of the Biceps in Active Patients Younger Than 45 Years Old
    Tahal, Dimitri S.
    Katthagen, J. Christoph
    Vap, Alexander R.
    Horan, Marilee P.
    Millett, Peter J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (06): : 1124 - 1130
  • [10] Outcomes of tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon more than three months after rupture
    McMahon, Patrick J.
    Speziali, Andrea
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 7 (03): : 188 - 194