共 50 条
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
被引:61
|作者:
Opie, George M.
[1
]
Vosnakis, Eleni
[1
]
Ridding, Michael C.
[2
]
Ziemann, Ulf
[3
]
Semmler, John G.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Robinson Res Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Neurol & Stroke, Tubingen, Germany
基金:
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词:
Ageing;
Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
Theta burst stimulation;
Metaplasticity;
Priming;
NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION;
CORTICAL PLASTICITY;
INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY;
EXCITABILITY;
METAPLASTICITY;
INDUCTION;
RTMS;
PROTOCOLS;
NETWORKS;
MEMORY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.003
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larger plastic response observed following priming with both long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD)-like protocols. However, it is not known if priming stimulation can also modulate plasticity in older adults. Objective: To investigate if priming NIBS can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity in old subjects. Methods: In 16 young (22.3 +/- 1.0 years) and 16 old (70.2 +/- 1.7 years) subjects, we investigated the response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; LTP-like) when applied 10 min after sham stimulation, continuous TBS (cTBS; LTD-like) or an identical block of iTBS. Corticospinal plasticity was assessed by recording changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Results: In young subjects, priming with cTBS (cTBS + iTBS) resulted in larger MEPs than priming with either iTBS (iTBS + iTBS; P = 0.001) or sham (sham + iTBS; P < 0.0001), while larger MEPs were seen following iTBS + iTBS than sham + iTBS (P < 0.0001). In old subjects, the response to iTBS + iTBS was not different to sham + iTBS (P > 0.9), whereas the response to cTBS + iTBS was reduced relative to iTBS + iTBS (P = 0.02) and sham + iTBS (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Priming TBS is ineffective for modifying M1 plasticity in older adults, which may limit the therapeutic use of priming stimulation in neurological conditions common in the elderly. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文