The 'vicious cycle' of personalised asthma action plan implementation in primary care: a qualitative study of patients and health professionals' views

被引:28
|
作者
Ring, Nicola [1 ]
Booth, Hazel [1 ]
Wilson, Caroline [1 ]
Hoskins, Gaylor [2 ]
Pinnock, Hilary [3 ]
Sheikh, Aziz [3 ]
Jepson, Ruth [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Sch Hlth Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, Nursing Midwifery & Allied Hlth Profess Res Unit, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Asthma UK Ctr Appl Res, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Scottish Collaborat Publ Hlth Res & Policy, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Barriers; Implementation; Personalised asthma action plans; Primary care; Qualitative; Self-management plans; SELF-MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-015-0352-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Personal asthma action plans (PAAPs) have been guideline recommended for years, but consistently under-issued by health professionals and under-utilised by patients. Previous studies have investigated sub-optimal PAAP implementation but more insight is needed into barriers to their use from the perspective of professionals, patients and primary care teams. Methods: A maximum variation sample of professional and patient participants were recruited from five demographically diverse general practices and another group of primary care professionals in one Scottish region. Interviews were digitally recorded and data thematically analysed using NVivo. Results: Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted (11 adults with asthma, seven general practitioners, ten practice nurses, one hospital respiratory nurse). Three over-arching themes emerged: 1) patients generally do not value PAAPs, 2) professionals do not fully value PAAPs and, 3) multiple barriers reduce the value of PAAPs in primary care. Six patients had a PAAP but these were outdated, not reflecting their needs and not used. Patients reported not wanting or needing PAAPs, yet identified circumstances when these could be useful. Fifteen professionals had selectively issued PAAPs with eight having reviewed one. Many professionals did not value PAAPs as they did not see patients using these and lacked awareness of times when patients could have benefited from one. Multi-level compounding barriers emerged. Individual barriers included poor patient awareness and professionals not reinforcing PAAP use. Organisational barriers included professionals having difficulty accessing PAAP templates and fragmented processes including patients not being asked to bring PAAPs to their asthma appointments. Conclusions: Primary care PAAP implementation is in a vicious cycle. Professionals infrequently review/update PAAPs with patients; patients with out-dated PAAPs do not value or use these; professionals observing patients' lack of interest in PAAPs do not discuss these. Patients observing this do not refer to their plans and perceive them to be of little value in asthma self-management. Twenty-five years after PAAPs were first recommended, primary care practices are still not ready to support their implementation. Breaking this vicious cycle to create a healthcare context more conducive to PAAP implementation requires a whole systems approach with multi-faceted interventions addressing patient, professional and organisational barriers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The ‘vicious cycle’ of personalised asthma action plan implementation in primary care: a qualitative study of patients and health professionals’ views
    Nicola Ring
    Hazel Booth
    Caroline Wilson
    Gaylor Hoskins
    Hilary Pinnock
    Aziz Sheikh
    Ruth Jepson
    BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [2] Case finding for COPD in primary care: a qualitative study of the views of health professionals
    Haroon, Shamil
    Jordan, Rachel E.
    Fitzmaurice, David A.
    Adab, Peymane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2015, 10 : 1711 - 1718
  • [3] Qualitative study of views of health professionals and patients on guided self management plans for asthma
    Jones, A
    Pill, R
    Adams, S
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7275): : 1507 - 1510
  • [4] Digitalising the personalised asthma action plan (PAAP) - a multi-perspective qualitative study
    Vaghela, Uddhav
    Moss, James
    Partridge, Martyn
    De Simoni, Anna
    Bush, Andrew
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [5] Views of xerostomia among health care professionals: a qualitative study
    Folke, Solgun
    Fridlund, Bengt
    Paulsson, Gun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (06) : 791 - 798
  • [6] HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' AND PATIENTS' VIEWS ON PRIMARY CARE SERVICES FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Mann, Cindy
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 : I130 - I131
  • [7] Health Care Professionals' Experiences and Views of eHealth in Pediatric Care: Qualitative Interview Study Applying a Theoretical Framework for Implementation
    Castor, Charlotte
    Lindkvist, Rose-Marie
    Hallstrom, Inger Kristensson
    Holmberg, Robert
    JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2023, 6
  • [8] A qualitative study of health care professionals' views and experiences of paediatric advance care planning
    Jack, Barbara A.
    Mitchell, Tracy K.
    O'Brien, Mary R.
    Silverio, Sergio A.
    Knighting, Katherine
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 17
  • [9] A qualitative study of health care professionals’ views and experiences of paediatric advance care planning
    Barbara A. Jack
    Tracy K. Mitchell
    Mary R. O’Brien
    Sergio A. Silverio
    Katherine Knighting
    BMC Palliative Care, 17
  • [10] Primary and tertiary health professionals’ views on the health-care of patients with co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease – a qualitative study
    Clement Lo
    Dragan Ilic
    Helena Teede
    Greg Fulcher
    Martin Gallagher
    Peter G Kerr
    Kerry Murphy
    Kevan Polkinghorne
    Grant Russell
    Timothy Usherwood
    Rowan Walker
    Sophia Zoungas
    BMC Nephrology, 17