Individual Differences in Social Media Use for Information Seeking

被引:98
|
作者
Kim, Kyung-Sun [1 ]
Sin, Sei-Ching Joanna [2 ]
Tsai, Tien-I [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun & Informat, Div Informat Studies, Singapore 637718, Singapore
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP | 2014年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词
Information sources; Social media; Undergraduates; User characteristics; COLLEGE-STUDENTS USE; PERSONALITY PREDICTORS; INTERNET USE; SELF-ESTEEM; FACEBOOK; LITERACY; WIKIPEDIA; GENDER; COMPETENCE; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.001
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study investigated which social media platforms are used as information sources, and for what purposes. It also examined how user characteristics are related to the use of different platforms. A Web-based survey was used to collect data from undergraduate students. Responses from more than 800 students showed that most of the social media platforms are used as information sources, where wilds, user reviews, and media-sharing sites emerged as the top platforms. The purpose of use varied across platforms. T-test and ANOVA results also revealed individual differences. Significant differences in gender, class level, academic discipline, and Big Five personality traits were found in the frequency of information seeking using different platforms and also in the purpose of use. Study findings have implications for information literacy (IL) education and information services. Because many students are actively using social media platforms for a variety of information-seeking purposes, it is suggested that IL programs embrace social media as potential information sources and offer effective strategies for using and evaluating these increasingly popular social media sources. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social media, information seeking, and generational differences
    不详
    ONLINE, 2008, 32 (02): : 5 - 5
  • [2] Individual differences in information-seeking
    Kelly, Christopher A.
    Sharot, Tali
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [3] Individual differences in information-seeking
    Christopher. A. Kelly
    Tali Sharot
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [4] Chimpanzees demonstrate individual differences in social information use
    Watson, Stuart K.
    Vale, Gillian L.
    Hopper, Lydia M.
    Dean, Lewis G.
    Kendal, Rachel L.
    Price, Elizabeth E.
    Wood, Lara A.
    Davis, Sarah J.
    Schapiro, Steven J.
    Lambeth, Susan P.
    Whiten, Andrew
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2018, 21 (05) : 639 - 650
  • [5] Chimpanzees demonstrate individual differences in social information use
    Stuart K. Watson
    Gillian L. Vale
    Lydia M. Hopper
    Lewis G. Dean
    Rachel L. Kendal
    Elizabeth E. Price
    Lara A. Wood
    Sarah J. Davis
    Steven J. Schapiro
    Susan P. Lambeth
    Andrew Whiten
    Animal Cognition, 2018, 21 : 639 - 650
  • [6] EXAMINING MICROBLOGGERS' INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MOTIVATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA USE
    Zhang, Dayong
    Feng, Xu
    Chen, Pu
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2018, 46 (04): : 667 - 682
  • [7] Individual differences in information seeking: An empirical study
    Ford, N
    Wilson, T
    Foster, A
    Ellis, D
    Spink, A
    ASIS 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 63RD ASIS ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 37, 2000, 2000, 37 : 14 - 24
  • [8] Preferences in the use of social media for seeking and communicating health and lifestyle information
    Palsdottir, Agusta
    INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2014, 19 (04):
  • [9] INDIVIDUAL VS SOCIAL PREDICTORS OF INFORMATION SEEKING
    CHAFFEE, SH
    MCLEOD, JM
    JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1973, 50 (02): : 237 - 245
  • [10] Leveraging Social Foci for Information Seeking in Social Media
    Ranganath, Suhas
    Tang, Jiliang
    Hu, Xia
    Sundaram, Hari
    Liu, Huan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, : 261 - 267